Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98594 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2010 05:02:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Aug 2010 05:02:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 80422 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2010 05:02:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80355 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2010 05:02:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80347 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2010 05:02:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:02:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of in.imtiaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:02:35 +0000 Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so55296pwj.6 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:02:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:references :subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=CjTS+5ffi/8pD7AfWQGbOc+ncRQ+zAbeFThSwTCwR8U=; b=tiQdtnsBSc8Wv8St+QRNdjQAzrvwU7SehSvYc8Y31RYLirBhhr8sG1ML7K/CWxKI9E o6vikTi24AvMEacLUH41KxQa3az8ZBnEvWZUOSc9BkhabPv2Yldu7nUt+fPS75AA0ZvH w2FQ79+MDbXRcbiRC/A7AFN5E/HQMXEqEW42E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=OoX8ji/MYHR91hqKQh6PKOWPBy9VKQ/YpOxgNZbckMMSFOSeaB2sbBoByoCiFoT6ee gz6wdjQM7Gs5FVAq0e6wz4pEtj7phWdKFu6GYznYThEpnTg9ZPGOlFBxTL/gvcwvMGWW 0pCYzPHTyTd04/EB8qsmEkfQc7eToIiGzAt9Q= Received: by 10.142.50.19 with SMTP id x19mr2947836wfx.128.1282453334547; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imtiaz20100131 ([122.167.23.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n2sm6157989wfl.13.2010.08.21.22.02.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: "Imtiaz Ahmed H E" To: References: Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:32:03 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 Dick, Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return, this morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it was working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it done asap. Imtiaz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" To: Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs > As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the > current source that don't exist on stax (For example, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to > deploy it on stax. > > Does anyone have a problem with that? > > D.