Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esjewett@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=bjLc9xne+1tOLIeUQacFvYwIUeOf/jm8cZ/1ruYydEY/wM9vpSyNX8FLQkogF2IspC
         7QBZpPWzBqzB4vjdaSuWLxX3xKlb8bpLJVz1xuiE2sRNYDmOboqciKHxYcqa8132mtEe
         F0s3e+phl33WB31bBamrhR74DRihaO9nbo3uU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <268F2E66-9DD7-4B43-8C76-3322073ED69C@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimOSxUBix6GJsuMRnaDZsJ5D1udBzoRkew_ii4S@mail.gmail.com>
	<268F2E66-9DD7-4B43-8C76-3322073ED69C@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:15:21 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTiknNSZt6SzUSKW7ppqs-U1wRw1rMK-I0GhoCSFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Working on next release: LDAP ?
From: Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c92ba0434ea9048979553e

--001636c92ba0434ea9048979553e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I agree that we should focus on 1 thing per release. UI for 1.1, then I'm
all for doing LDAP in the next release (1.2, 2.0, whatever).

Ethan

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
<yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:

> I agree, the other issues for the 1.1 release are more important IMO.
> Maybe LDAP integration would be better for a 2.0 release?
>
> /Anne
>
>
> On 16. juni 2010, at 10.51, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>
> > I'm considering moving the LDAP integration (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135 ) to the backlog. The
> next
> > release should probably just be focused on the UI changes.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > D.
>
>

--001636c92ba0434ea9048979553e--