Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yojibee@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=OC6KO2Wly8aYs66sTJurhMWJthZMm+hrsLxXnpPCMRlO2JkmKyE8seyq6X4qaaEroU
         GiBjTmnAJWwNT4ZE4dgvfbhlp91aDRfi8THRua25TPW6nB1ukbqlAZfsea82Hes2a/5A
         GA3yjldb0Uh1JY/A+JS98r68TPgI6btrlIGCY=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Subject: Re: Broken OpenID
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Anne_Kathrine_Petter=F8e?= <yojibee@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim-8J3naA_udj9xvMkIq7iIa4Mep0ukLwh6WPNy@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:11:20 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <20A007BC-E8D0-4820-B0BF-54DDBC02580A@gmail.com>
References: <217D3BC7-2400-4B5F-AA2A-260D87013134@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTim-8J3naA_udj9xvMkIq7iIa4Mep0ukLwh6WPNy@mail.gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org

It kind of works, see Jira task #206 =
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-206
I was just wondering if we should spend the time maintaining the code if =
isn't working properly?

/Anne

On 7. juni 2010, at 10.08, Vassil Dichev wrote:

> If the code is already there and it doesn't take a lot of effort to
> maintain, why not?
>=20
> I had the impression that OpenID worked, isn't this the case?
>=20
> Vassil
>=20
>=20
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
> <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was looking at the open Jira tasks for release 1.1.
>> Do we really want to support OpenID? With our enterprise focus and =
LDAP support with this release, I cannot really see a need for OpenID =
anymore. What do you think?
>>=20
>> /Anne