esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: pubsubhubbub
Date Fri, 21 May 2010 19:04:50 GMT
Sounds way cool - so if I understand PSHB  correctly - we would then be a
subscriber as well as a publisher?  Why I don't completely understand is the
connection to actions? Would there be a PHSB action that sends messages to a
hub?

D.

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not very far, but enough to build on, and I plan to keep going once I'm on
> my sabbatical (starting in 1 week!!). There is a branch in the svn
> repository that has all my progress in it.
>
> The basic approach was in to parts:
>
> 1. Add an indicator to the action that the feed is PSHB-enabled (determined
> by analyzing the feed when the action is polled), and in this case we would
> never start the poller. Instead we would initiate a subscription.
>
> 2. The second half was to add a PSHB handler that could receive callbacks
> from hubs related to specific actions and post messages based on these
> callbacks.
>
> I think I got about 1/3 done with each of these tasks :-)
>
> An additional nice-to-have would be to implement use of the optional
> signing
> scheme for hubs that support it, though this is not necessary to reach our
> current level of security.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > @Ethan: Out of curiosity, how far did you get on your pubsubhubbub
> > implementation?
> >
> > D.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message