Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33671 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2010 17:28:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2010 17:28:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 37503 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2010 17:28:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37480 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2010 17:28:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37472 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2010 17:28:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:28:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esjewett@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.185] (HELO mail-pz0-f185.google.com) (209.85.222.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:28:02 +0000 Received: by pzk15 with SMTP id 15so3317230pzk.21 for ; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:27:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XPkWnIflBIYljoB3kZwEZ/0VkuhGrrxPaMnyL8rGhng=; b=OxLWso+scafz3dXZYUE0yqtz3xzectfb5WikTaZtqgLzQfYd+jKZUUneNc2OYXsEfo yEwKY1GeiBMbPyubyeXhu7eUE1bbB0Ssg2W4YIXlIeaqFaF/sWEpBASpy5aIXIcjci1n y+IG/D3Uxq9wjirUqy0W5zJ0Q6TwgIWLS+1zU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Mw37ZybYyebvkur0nf9H+nsm47ekwH7DsvIt+uMCXSppn9oIDDBhHTsu8L2ARixoYP tRYEkLnwi0r55sYN4dZa3/yBGJqmIUm4pRszsfq+H8npF1BynGjaFpOIh1rVHgE/x2T8 Vh7KBB7+pVZdld8Zj3SobWj26tVs8BXN/KcRY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.106.15 with SMTP id i15mr2390631rvm.252.1267982860764; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:27:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:27:40 -0600 Message-ID: <68f4a0e81003070927s2c9d2b92ufa46640633490a0d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: New branch for UI From: Ethan Jewett To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I agree. I don't see much utility in the public timeline. I think we should drop it and focus on searching and user-defined streams. Ethan On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Vassil Dichev wrote: >> IMO we don't need it. >> We have search and streams. >> >> On 7. mars 2010, at 17.25, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> >>> Do we even need the public timeline? Or should it just be accessible >>> via Streams Page. > > I've said before that I don't see much utility in the public timeline, > and it also poses performance problems, as it's difficult to cache and > doesn't scale well. >