Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31360 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 06:31:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2010 06:31:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 54062 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 06:31:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54036 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 06:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54028 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 06:31:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:31:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yojibee@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.214] (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:31:36 +0000 Received: by mail-ew0-f214.google.com with SMTP id 6so962027ewy.36 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:31:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=vtVQDvhRbD6AvMSd2GcvvPlnU6Svyfa4Z+uHbUFXfwc=; b=ie/q79QYwnQtG1K9IdH+etAaofVRvAmgSmElc+Kc38MMGiJ9i9Cz5gtaW4UThmOiTH Vq/nO9BtA3gbRa09HZF7FJjqL3bQNm0FmuaKST0/iqdxlMR2ti1iNC25ST1bcqKWvCHb 1c04ljUBsSzCbg/Xo3XbBD141vafRJDifiKKo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=QNevcwh7rPOwzYAouIEjHJVzdl40NESzU/3zqqRsgRUD059tUwWrYlMut6hSRjq96B TGekBLA2mOkMhmAnS/k2j9/E/Gu2FSqEOnwkqv6iLaPAkOmHfk5PZRb0S5XyS6YvVxYD 1ec6165RGWT8iVIX6TVGipZSZNRref8ZgaA84= Received: by 10.213.54.3 with SMTP id o3mr307778ebg.76.1268893875503; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dzcpi0d9e007.i04.local (users.intility.com [193.71.38.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm4914998ewy.6.2010.03.17.23.31.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: Lift 2.0 Snapshot for next release? From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Anne_Kathrine_Petter=F8e?= In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:31:15 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2E9DC5A2-1022-47A6-B9CD-85E1B3D2EC3F@gmail.com> References: To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for the 1.1 = release. (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135) Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot. On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: > 1.1 with UI >=20 > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e > wrote: >=20 >> Which release do you refer to as next? >> If RC2 I'd say no. >>=20 >> - anne >>=20 >>=20 >> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>=20 >>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release? We would = get >> LDAP >>> support which is now part of the current snapshot? >>>=20 >>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch.... >>>=20 >>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes... >>>=20 >>> D. >>=20 >>=20