esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lift 2.0 Snapshot for next release?
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:35:03 GMT
Let's say that the UI + LDAP + bug fixes are the focus for the next release.
Everything else goes into the backlog.

D.



On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>
> > I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are in
> > releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than the
> > backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that item
> > is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed, I
> > think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different
> > (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-)
> >
> +1
> For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take too much
> water over our heads.
>
> > With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or LDAP
> > support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as
> > important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not,
> > let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving
> > to Lift 2.0 until that point).
>
> LDAP support is important.
> I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't support
> it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1
>

+1

>
> >
> > Ethan
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for the 1.1
> release.
> >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135)
> >> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot.
> >>
> >> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> >>
> >>> 1.1  with UI
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Which release do you refer to as next?
> >>>> If RC2 I'd say no.
> >>>>
> >>>> - anne
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release? We would
get
> >>>> LDAP
> >>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch....
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> D.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message