esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yoji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lift 2.0 Snapshot for next release?
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:01:18 GMT
You are fast! :)

On 18. mars 2010, at 20.40, Richard Hirsch wrote:

> Here is the code:
> 
> http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/211/diff/1/
> 
> Looks pretty straight-forward.
> 
> we still need an ldap to use a test: ldap.bigfoot.com:389 seens like a  good
> choice
> 
> http://raleigh.pm.org/ldap-talk.html
> 
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> I have tried to follow that discussion as best I could too.
>> If we start to use it, it might also speed things up a bit. There is
>> nothing better for a developer than seeing his work being implemented and
>> used :-)
>> 
>> - anne
>> 
>> 
>> On 18. mars 2010, at 19.24, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>> 
>>> Based on what I've seen on the lift mailing list, the LDAP support in
>> lift
>>> is still in its early stages but it should still provide an excellent
>> start
>>> for us.
>>> 
>>> D.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I don't really have an opinion about LDAP aside from thinking that we
>>>> need it. I definitely support this approach.
>>>> 
>>>> Ethan
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Let's say that the UI + LDAP + bug fixes are the focus for the next
>>>> release.
>>>>> Everything else goes into the backlog.
>>>>> 
>>>>> D.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that
are in
>>>>>>> releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than
the
>>>>>>> backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until
that
>> item
>>>>>>> is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed,
I
>>>>>>> think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different
>>>>>>> (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not
:-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take
too
>>>> much
>>>>>> water over our heads.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI
or LDAP
>>>>>>> support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is
as
>>>>>>> important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's
not,
>>>>>>> let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off
moving
>>>>>>> to Lift 2.0 until that point).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> LDAP support is important.
>>>>>> I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't
>> support
>>>>>> it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ethan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>>>> <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged
for the
>>>> 1.1
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135)
>>>>>>>> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 1.1  with UI
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>>>>>> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Which release do you refer to as next?
>>>>>>>>>> If RC2 I'd say no.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> - anne
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next
release? We would
>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>> LDAP
>>>>>>>>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch....
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes...
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message