esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yoji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lift 2.0 Snapshot for next release?
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:48:35 GMT
I have tried to follow that discussion as best I could too.
If we start to use it, it might also speed things up a bit. There is nothing better for a
developer than seeing his work being implemented and used :-)

- anne


On 18. mars 2010, at 19.24, Richard Hirsch wrote:

> Based on what I've seen on the lift mailing list, the LDAP support in lift
> is still in its early stages but it should still provide an excellent start
> for us.
> 
> D.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I don't really have an opinion about LDAP aside from thinking that we
>> need it. I definitely support this approach.
>> 
>> Ethan
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Let's say that the UI + LDAP + bug fixes are the focus for the next
>> release.
>>> Everything else goes into the backlog.
>>> 
>>> D.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are in
>>>>> releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than the
>>>>> backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that item
>>>>> is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed, I
>>>>> think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different
>>>>> (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-)
>>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take too
>> much
>>>> water over our heads.
>>>> 
>>>>> With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or LDAP
>>>>> support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as
>>>>> important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not,
>>>>> let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving
>>>>> to Lift 2.0 until that point).
>>>> 
>>>> LDAP support is important.
>>>> I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't support
>>>> it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ethan
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>> <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for
the
>> 1.1
>>>> release.
>>>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135)
>>>>>> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 1.1  with UI
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>>>> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Which release do you refer to as next?
>>>>>>>> If RC2 I'd say no.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - anne
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release?
We would
>> get
>>>>>>>> LDAP
>>>>>>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch....
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message