esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ethan Jewett <esjew...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lift 2.0 Snapshot for next release?
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:16:26 GMT
I don't really have an opinion about LDAP aside from thinking that we
need it. I definitely support this approach.

Ethan

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's say that the UI + LDAP + bug fixes are the focus for the next release.
> Everything else goes into the backlog.
>
> D.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>>
>> > I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are in
>> > releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than the
>> > backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that item
>> > is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed, I
>> > think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different
>> > (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-)
>> >
>> +1
>> For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take too much
>> water over our heads.
>>
>> > With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or LDAP
>> > support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as
>> > important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not,
>> > let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving
>> > to Lift 2.0 until that point).
>>
>> LDAP support is important.
>> I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't support
>> it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1
>>
>
> +1
>
>>
>> >
>> > Ethan
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for the 1.1
>> release.
>> >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135)
>> >> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot.
>> >>
>> >> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> 1.1  with UI
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >>> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Which release do you refer to as next?
>> >>>> If RC2 I'd say no.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> - anne
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release? We
would get
>> >>>> LDAP
>> >>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch....
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> D.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message