Return-Path: 
 <esme-dev-return-3029-apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85108 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2010 15:18:41 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2010 15:18:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 66139 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2010 15:18:41 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65859 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2010 15:18:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:esme-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:esme-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <esme-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65804 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2010 15:18:40 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:18:40 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hirsch.dick@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.92.147 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.92.147] (HELO qw-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.92.147)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:18:32 +0000
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so4979387qwf.54
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=sZDPUeJUn2B50dRu/j5xEFcOduWnCN1NrvfhYIDef/w=;
        b=a/0osV2wm+Cu8O7moGusnPROjsxsYDfYit+Tj7Wwb7xvOv+9gE5nWIEgf5CzAeH+/H
         9NvXvuzbvM0AMQnFf0YLhHweFomBasFsRbXMAPhte5qJV4OOI6Fmz2PRW2/ll6RHk/Sc
         dz1GBnXp2zG3P5utsZMBNIcaft6xM6ZqpN+hU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=wEI+dQy8wnW9p/xm0Hu4ovpUiV09B5GJOS+zOINdL9mQSg0sxyrkmADMjVKCzsHxUP
         ANZGNj8gn0jduv4S6QgZ1WEVvX+ZzttpEecW9yd+ilXXi58YEKaCNN4f/98AatV8yxrx
         UXfM5C3Hn8l+5JH0aZZSfnUoTv4HrgGSrKfyk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.76.32 with SMTP id d32mr4809862mul.95.1266333490286; Tue,
	16 Feb 2010 07:18:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fa2d9f451002160717u2d79d174t3fb37ba5133ffd8e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fa2d9f451002150705u6d749c25g6c5b5a295f04d6a7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <201002160957.55436.dkulp@apache.org>
	 <fa2d9f451002160717u2d79d174t3fb37ba5133ffd8e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:18:10 +0100
Message-ID: <fa2d9f451002160718g3c6c6b42k61cf4df15db06e11@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0
From: Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org, esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b61ccdb1057047fb93d03

--0016e65b61ccdb1057047fb93d03
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0
To: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>




On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:

>
> +1 (mentor and IPMC binding)
>
> Some thoughts, but nothing that I would consider a "show stopper" since
> this
> is a source only release  (aka: not providing a prebuilt war type thing o=
r
> deploying it to Maven central):
>
> 1) The README mentions a "Collective work: Copyright 2007", but the NOTIC=
E
> starts the copyright at 2008.   That said, I'd just remove the License
> section
> from the README entirely.
>

Done.

>
> 2) The tar unpacks into a "trunk" directory.   That really should unpack
> into
> a "apache-esme-1.0" directory or similar.
>

I'll change this for the next release.


>
> 3) The "version" number in the pom is still 0.3.0-SNAPSHOT.  Thus, if you
> build it, you get a snapshot war.    Not a "huge" deal if we're not
> providing
> a binary war, but a bit unusual and unexpected.
>

What would be better in the pom.xml:     <version>apache-esme-1.0</version>=
?


>
> 4) Snapshot dependencies.   It has dependencies on snapshots from Lift.
> Not
> good for a "release" as the release isn't really reproducible.
>

Do you mean: <lift.version>1.1-SNAPSHOT</lift.version>? I'll remember it fo=
r
the next release.


>
> 5) Very minor suggestion:  if you are Java 6 only, you could exclude thin=
gs
> like activation.jar, xml-apis, and most likely xerces to make the war a
> little
> bit smaller..
>

We are hoping to be JDK 1.5 "buildable" again in the future (crossing our
fingers...), so I wanted to leave these files in the release


>
> As far as the legal bits go, looks ok for a source release, so +1.
>
> Dan
>

Thanks


>
>
> On Mon February 15 2010 10:05:43 am Richard Hirsch wrote:
> > The ESME community has voted on and approved the release of ESME 1.0.
> > We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for
> > this release.
> >
> > Details of the ESME community vote can be found here:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-esme-dev/201002.mbox/%=
3C
> > fa2d9f451002120649u54cdd8b5red151033d655b66a@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The candidate can be found at:
> >
> >  http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erh=
irsch/esme/>
> >
> > See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release
> > candidate is a tar archive of the sources in
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/esme-1.0-incubating/
> >
> > The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0-
> > src.tar.gz release package is
> > A4 9B 04 07 47 66 41 0C  FE 01 2D 8B 5C 23 33 18
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating.
> >
> >  Please vote to publish this release by Thursday, Feb 18 16:03 CET,
> >  please include the testing you performed to arrive at your vote
> > [  ] +1 Publish
> > [  ]   0 Abstain
> > [  ] -1 Don't publish, because...
> >
> > Below is a summary of the vote on the ESME mailing list
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Dick
> >
> > ---------------
> >
> > Sender-time   Sent at 4:00 PM (GMT+01:00). Current time there: 4:04 PM.=
 =E2=9C=86
> > to    esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > date  Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM
> > subject       [VOTE][RESULT] ESME 1.0
> > mailed-by     gmail.com
> >
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Voting on the ESME 1.0  candidate release has concluded
> >
> > Results:
> >
> > 6 binding +1 vote
> >
> > Dick Hirsch  +1
> > Mrinal Wadhwa  +1
> > Vassil Dichev  +1
> > Ethan Jewett  +1
> > Anne Kathrine Petteroe +1
> > Darren Hague +1
> >
> > 1 non-binding +1 votes
> >
> > Daniel Koller  +1
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>

--0016e65b61ccdb1057047fb93d03--