Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48234 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2010 14:28:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2010 14:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 77970 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2010 14:28:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77911 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2010 14:27:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77901 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2010 14:27:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:27:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hirsch.dick@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.226] (HELO mail-bw0-f226.google.com) (209.85.218.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:27:50 +0000 Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so2926327bwz.27 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:27:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AkkTMEoa/8+q0AoBVdnx0WmPMyDvULkjr+7NmbN3l1w=; b=Nw9hA+QWMHyah/Z6cHyJwgjE7zi7POqR0aMlYBDSvcp1v8aVcqZ/BIUXt8Eif2nJ31 WIilyuPILGjmDGMqHDeUkg+9+qPiPP/Z0HrTgrxsKFwrvrf8sbjC6C7hlyl6srJpg8Qk jESifXh5Wt6iBZku6Rv1jxhg/gaGKbhbx5f50= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OYw6hJ9Rp4SnVLfEhYrbkAkudi2+aulABA4rCYh0pMPWeF6RxNlAvl7mYNp08gUniE tP0RJxgeTJv+Bd9AQE+x0kYhBoFQoJs+Huja4KX/JOGvRicjHFqMTjWRqOARKFQdHsD+ 77DKooSkgWe0F7ykzn92/Stg6pBaTT45EW0SY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.161.12 with SMTP id j12mr1901339mue.72.1265380048676; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:27:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <746B7AC6-B83E-476B-90E1-A484FF8946AD@gmail.com> References: <5AB1C651-F451-4AF4-9AA8-99FAB9496CF1@gmail.com> <68f4a0e81001290554v51d83c2ak4f4fc4d2cfa84faa@mail.gmail.com> <746B7AC6-B83E-476B-90E1-A484FF8946AD@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:27:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...) From: Richard Hirsch To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just finished cleaning up our SVN. Added licenses where needed and threw out files that weren't used. I added the latest rat listing to the JIRA item. We currently just have two files with a licensing issue: !????? src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.min.js !????? src/main/webapp/style/smoothness/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.css Both have the dual licensing: /* * jQuery UI 1.7.2 * * Copyright (c) 2009 AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about) * Dual licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt) * and GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses. * * http://docs.jquery.com/UI */ I looked at the thread that Anne mentioned and didn't really find a final decision. @mentors: any suggestions I did some quick testing in the UI. Maybe others can test with the latest code drop to se if anything else is broken. D. On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e wrote: > A discussion on legal-discuss pointed me to this discussion about dual li= censing, interesting to read: > http://markmail.org/thread/b46v73m6thhm5zw4 > > /Anne > > On 29. jan. 2010, at 20.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> We probably have to clean up the JQuery-related script files any way - >> get the most recent version, etc. >> >> D. >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Richard Hirsch = wrote: >>> As Bertrand mentioned in the first post in this thread, this is >>> probably the way to go... >>> >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ethan Jewett wrot= e: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Since JQuery is MIT licensed, why can't we just include it (unchanged) >>>> in the distribution as third-party code? >>>> >>>> Ethan >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>> Looks cool. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Only problem is that I didn't find a maven repoistory with the JQuery= files. >>>>> >>>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Richard Hirsch >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Re: maven-soultion, I was thinking about JQuery stuff. =A0If its MI= T >>>>>>> license is ok, then we just have to see the instructions on dealing >>>>>>> with third party works.... >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, in Sling we have a similar case with dojo, and what we do is >>>>>> download it at build time, and store in a local cache for future >>>>>> builds. >>>>>> >>>>>> See the "Dynamically download the Dojo Toolkit" bit in >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/contrib/extensions/dojo/= pom.xml >>>>>> >>>>>> -Bertrand >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > >