Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esjewett@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=w07Utx7dzqOAZxOAm3S0+13dCVy9BbRH4X9JmWPyAweOwl2E+UTjY9b6QhCEhiOPHP
         YGV6lrvi4MQEQmzFxnpShQiyF9ynyqtvAWMBsVCdNo70AM7R8v+7vmq7fGqII9qq3aTV
         p/BhsQckVaurplKYeHvlTzoo5gnTGAbg5pKUA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fa2d9f451001241219r986ad25xa1f99e91be3b17c@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <13752180.3241264249265039.JavaMail.hudson@hudson.zones.apache.org>
	 <14797168.3661264335483840.JavaMail.hudson@hudson.zones.apache.org>
	 <fa2d9f451001241219r986ad25xa1f99e91be3b17c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:45:22 -0600
Message-ID: <68f4a0e81001241245u4b6d3846vbea68f398e14cb1e@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hudson build is still unstable: ESME #89
From: Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

They are security issues, right? I'd say in that case I think they
need to be in.

Can you open Jira tickets for them and set the "Fix Release" to 1.0? I
might be able to look at them this week.

Ethan

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
> The hudson build is always failing, because I committed a few tests of the
> old API that should work but aren't working. Should I add them to the
> Release 1.0 JIRA list or comment them out?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Apache Hudson Server <hudson@hudson.zones.apache.org>
> Date: Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:18 PM
> Subject: Hudson build is still unstable: ESME #89
> To: rhirsch@apache.org
>
>
> See <http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/89/>
>