Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:20:35 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>
References: <A833ECB3-7D9F-4660-AA8D-C5CEB0727CEE@gmail.com>
 <27DFFAE1-3B10-45E4-8BD3-A6E0B91EDDBC@gmail.com>
 <821528.34626.qm@web54409.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <821528.34626.qm@web54409.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201001271620.35829.dkulp@apache.org>

On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information,
> but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache
> who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot.
>=20
>=20
> That's also something this project would be well-advised to look
> into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm
> at Apache.

It's already in Hudson:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/

I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is working=
=20
fine.

Dan


>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message ----
>=20
> > From: Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e <yojibee@gmail.com>
> > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >
> > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
> >
> > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned
> > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
> >
> > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
> > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
> > > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
> > >
> > > Ethan
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
> > >> server.  There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
> > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>
> > >>> From: Ethan Jewett
> > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>
> > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> > >>> though.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ethan
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://git.apache.org/
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request.  But
> > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> > >>>> for git.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
> > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just
> > >>>>> delete
> >
> > it
> >
> > >>>>> now.
> > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file.  If the devs
> > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> > >>>>>> of svn.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
> > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess.  It really depends
> > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
> > >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I
> > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>
> > >>> trunk.
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as
> > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay
> > >>>>>>>> where it is?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now.  What has
> > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/.  And where is the corresponding
> > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME?  NOTICE should be right next to that.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
> > >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
> > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Licensing
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done.  Technically there should be a line for Apache's
> >
> > copyright
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection arou=
nd
> > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > >>>>>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >>
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >> Do You Yahoo!?
> > >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>=20
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>=20

=2D-=20
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog