esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...)
Date Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:30:25 GMT
Re: maven-soultion, I was thinking about JQuery stuff.  If its MIT
license is ok, then we just have to see the instructions on dealing
with third party works.

BTW, don't know whether jquery is even necessary with new UI....

On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petter√łe <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't want to have *any* LGPL/GPL stuff in our code.
> I'd rather try to see if we can find other libraries/scripts to use for our
> UI.
>
> /Anne
>
>
> On 29. jan. 2010, at 12.10, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> ...maven-based solution might be more useful...
>>
>> If what you mean is maven automatically downloading GPL/LGPL stuff at
>> build time, that's not ok.
>>
>> Unless there's a big prominent warning that people cannot miss, and
>> then only if those components are optional.
>>
>> The key is that whatever is required to use what we release (which is
>> source code - binary releases are a convenience only) must have an
>> acceptable license according to http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>
>> This is just to clarify for everybody, I don't mean you're doing
>> things wrong ;-)
>>
>> -Bertrand
>
>

Mime
View raw message