esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Date Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:29:09 GMT
Hudson is working fine - I'm thinking about hooking it up to our Amazon
cloud instances

D.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:

> On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information,
> > but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache
> > who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot.
> >
> >
> > That's also something this project would be well-advised to look
> > into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm
> > at Apache.
>
> It's already in Hudson:
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/
>
> I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is working
> fine.
>
> Dan
>
>
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yojibee@gmail.com>
> > > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM
> > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >
> > > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
> > >
> > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned
> > > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
> > >
> > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
> > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
> > > > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
> > > >
> > > > Ethan
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
> > > >> server.  There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
> > > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>
> > > >>> From: Ethan Jewett
> > > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least
I
> > > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from
my
> > > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> > > >>> though.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Ethan
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> http://git.apache.org/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> > > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request.  But
> > > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> > > >>>> for git.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume
we can
> just
> > > >>>>> delete
> > >
> > > it
> > >
> > > >>>>> now.
> > > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file.  If the
devs
> > > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others
to do
> > > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> > > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from
our git
> > > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit
as well.
> > > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors
do all
> > > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any
interested
> > > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly)
out
> > > >>>>>> of svn.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
> > > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is
now closed
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess.  It really
depends
> > > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all
3 of those files
> > > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits"
is now closed
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> > > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file.
It is this one I
> > > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add
a LICENSE.txt file
> to
> > > >>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>
> > > >>> trunk.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file
to the trunk as
> > > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base?
Should it stay
> > > >>>>>>>> where it is?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect
now.  What has
> > > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the
base of the svn tree
> > > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/.  And where is
the corresponding
> > > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME?  NOTICE should
be right next to that.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28
PM
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing
Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again
now.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer
wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010
1:15:22 PM
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing
Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone
know that I just closed
> ESME-47
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Licensing
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone
who has helped resolve this
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done.  Technically there
should be a line for Apache's
> > >
> > > copyright
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of
the NOTICE file as well, see
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best
spam protection
> around
> > > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >>>>>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
> > > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >>
> > > >> __________________________________________________
> > > >> Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message