esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Burrell Donkin <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
Date Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:51:37 GMT
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Anne Kathrine Petter√łe
<> wrote:
> PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47.


> 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where
the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not
made any contribution):
> /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */


if this language has not been cleared with our lawyers on legal-private then :

* i'm -1 on this phrasing
* please raise a legal JIRA for appropriate language


the reason for this veto is that i believe that this phrasing is

1. potentially untrue

for example, if at some future time someone decides to revert all the
relevant commits - or in time the code is so extensively revised then
no portions of the code will be subject to that copyright and the
statement will be untrue.

2. potentially dangerous

for example it could be read as a claim rather than a statement

AIUI (please jump in if i'm wrong) some source files was derived from
originals that contained the notice "Copyright 2009 WorldWide
Conferencing, LLC". something along the lines below seems to me more

* This document was derived from an original containing the following
copyright notice:
*     Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC

but IMO this is a job for a lawyer

- robert

View raw message