esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vassil Dichev <vdic...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Date Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:06:59 GMT
A bit late, but I would also like to have the git interface set up.


On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I would suggest sending the notifications to the dev list
> instead of to one-or-two developer's inboxes, but otherwise
> if you're happy with Hudson by all means stick with it.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 4:29:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>
>> Hudson is working fine - I'm thinking about hooking it up to our Amazon
>> cloud instances
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information,
>> > > but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache
>> > > who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > That's also something this project would be well-advised to look
>> > > into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm
>> > > at Apache.
>> >
>> > It's already in Hudson:
>> > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/
>> >
>> > I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is working
>> > fine.
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message ----
>> > >
>> > > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > > > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM
>> > > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > >
>> > > > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
>> > > >
>> > > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned
>> > > > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
>> > > >
>> > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>> > > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
>> > > > > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Ethan
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our
svn
>> > > > >> server.  There's a wiki page which explains what you need
to do
>> > > > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> From: Ethan Jewett
>> > > > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
>> > > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git
(at least I
>> > > > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream
from my
>> > > > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror.
Not sure
>> > > > >>> though.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Ethan
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> http://git.apache.org/
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then
I
>> > > > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request.
 But
>> > > > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
>> > > > >>>> for git.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > > > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
>> > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is
now closed
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so
I assume we can
>> > just
>> > > > >>>>> delete
>> > > >
>> > > > it
>> > > >
>> > > > >>>>> now.
>> > > > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file.
 If the devs
>> > > > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage
others to do
>> > > > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror
from infrastructure.
>> > > > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to
sync from our git
>> > > > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that
benefit as well.
>> > > > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the
git mirrors do all
>> > > > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it
out to any interested
>> > > > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history
(slowly) out
>> > > > >>>>>> of svn.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
>> > > > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
>> > > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing
Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess.
 It really depends
>> > > > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release-
all 3 of those files
>> > > > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the
package.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > > > >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49
PM
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing
Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out
now.
>> > > > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE
file. It is this one I
>> > > > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where
I add a LICENSE.txt file
>> > to
>> > > > >>>>>>>> the
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> trunk.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the
NOTICE file to the trunk as
>> > > > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at
the base? Should it stay
>> > > > >>>>>>>> where it is?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer
wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file
look perfect now.  What has
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it
at the base of the svn tree
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/.  And
where is the corresponding
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME?  NOTICE
should be right next to that.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010
2:10:28 PM
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some
Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE
file again now.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59,
Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message
----
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine
Petterøe
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January
27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47
"Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let
everyone know that I just closed
>> > ESME-47
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Licensing
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to
everyone who has helped resolve this
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue!
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done.  Technically
there should be a line for Apache's
>> > > >
>> > > > copyright
>> > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the
top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail
has the best spam protection
>> > around
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>> > > > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > > >>>>>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the
best spam protection around
>> > > > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> __________________________________________________
>> > > > >> Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > > >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
>> > > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > >
>> > > __________________________________________________
>> > > Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Kulp
>> > dkulp@apache.org
>> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>> >
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message