esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sig Rinde <...@rinde.com>
Subject Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...)
Date Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:05:31 GMT
Looks like I'm in for some serious bug-testing soon :)

So, just tell me when you've finished messing around so I can mess it
up - Linux and OS X here !


On 29 January 2010 11:28, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
> accordian isn't used but tabs are...
>
> maven-based solution might be more useful
>
> On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think we should just throw out the Accordion too, we aren't using it
>> currently anyway. (it was part of the UI started last year)
>> Better be safe than sorry.
>>
>> Thanks for going through this.
>>
>> /Anne
>>
>> On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.53, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>
>>> I think we can delete the following files can be deleted:
>>>
>>> wz_tooltip.js + all the other js files that start with tip_
>>>
>>> The files starting with "ui." appear to be jQuery scripts (
>>> http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Accordion)  but do not have a license header
>>> in our SVN. If you look at this link
>>> (http://jqueryui.com/latest/ui/ui.core.js), you will see that they are
>>> dual licensed.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Get rid of them immediately is all I have to say.
>>>> We cannot have LGPL licensed scripts in our code.
>>>>
>>>> /Anne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.40, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to
make
>>>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> I think many of these files are old ones that are no longer necessary.
>>>>> Most are linked to the old UI any way....
>>>>>
>>>>> D.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Him
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> ...We also scripts in SVN with various copyrights. What do we
need and
>>>>>>> what can we toss. Is there a way to pull in these scripts via
the
>>>>>>> build process so that we are not part of our SVN?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here are few examples below:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.min.js?view=markup).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This one's fine, MIT license is ok according to
>>>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>>>> but the license header must remain intact, see "third-party works"
in
>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/tip_balloon.js?view=markup
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This one's unclear, but according to the next one which is from the
>>>>>> same source I'd guess it's LGPL, so not good.
>>>>>> Anyway it doesn't indicate permission to redistribute - to be checked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/wz_tooltip.js?view=markup
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This one's LGPL as indicated in the header, so it has to go (see
>>>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it's required for ESME to work, an alternate solution has to be
>>>>>> found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it's optional, instructing users to download it separately is
fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Under NO circumstances should license headers of third-party code
be
>>>>>> removed in Apache code repositories - if you see any more LGPL/GPL
>>>>>> stuff in ESME's SVN please discuss that here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to
make
>>>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Bertrand
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message