esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anne Kathrine Petter√łe <yoji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...)
Date Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:02:34 GMT
I think we should just throw out the Accordion too, we aren't using it currently anyway. (it
was part of the UI started last year)
Better be safe than sorry.

Thanks for going through this. 

/Anne

On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.53, Richard Hirsch wrote:

> I think we can delete the following files can be deleted:
> 
> wz_tooltip.js + all the other js files that start with tip_
> 
> The files starting with "ui." appear to be jQuery scripts (
> http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Accordion)  but do not have a license header
> in our SVN. If you look at this link
> (http://jqueryui.com/latest/ui/ui.core.js), you will see that they are
> dual licensed.
> 
> D.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petter√łe <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Get rid of them immediately is all I have to say.
>> We cannot have LGPL licensed scripts in our code.
>> 
>> /Anne
>> 
>> 
>> On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.40, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>> 
>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make
>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release.
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> I think many of these files are old ones that are no longer necessary.
>>> Most are linked to the old UI any way....
>>> 
>>> D.
>>> 
>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Him
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> ...We also scripts in SVN with various copyrights. What do we need and
>>>>> what can we toss. Is there a way to pull in these scripts via the
>>>>> build process so that we are not part of our SVN?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here are few examples below:
>>>>> 
>>>>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.min.js?view=markup).
>>>> 
>>>> This one's fine, MIT license is ok according to
>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>> but the license header must remain intact, see "third-party works" in
>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/tip_balloon.js?view=markup
>>>> 
>>>> This one's unclear, but according to the next one which is from the
>>>> same source I'd guess it's LGPL, so not good.
>>>> Anyway it doesn't indicate permission to redistribute - to be checked.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/wz_tooltip.js?view=markup
>>>> 
>>>> This one's LGPL as indicated in the header, so it has to go (see
>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html).
>>>> 
>>>> If it's required for ESME to work, an alternate solution has to be found.
>>>> 
>>>> If it's optional, instructing users to download it separately is fine.
>>>> 
>>>> Under NO circumstances should license headers of third-party code be
>>>> removed in Apache code repositories - if you see any more LGPL/GPL
>>>> stuff in ESME's SVN please discuss that here.
>>>> 
>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make
>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release.
>>>> 
>>>> -Bertrand
>>>> 
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message