Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61251 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2009 11:51:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Dec 2009 11:51:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 66808 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 11:51:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66764 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 11:51:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66754 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2009 11:51:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:51:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yojibee@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.214] (HELO mail-fx0-f214.google.com) (209.85.220.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:51:51 +0000 Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so4756301fxm.20 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:51:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=8C9Vm5GU9tpw6MzRxCbXr056JmdVTxHv753pNl4ZWCw=; b=PAIR37kUIGD3pEOsED+TMZFBX0wmS7DU+xqvE26AF0ANeLASRflmBlSq8ZIzb8bdXy T0eVZmyUTqHJ+ndtwm4aEexPUZ4Wmu/HZAdC0vl1CKX9eZ3CbvqJoWwlZjKLDvjaK3fl RBH8uGa2EkhlR28BDZZI3J0BsQABdfTncLywQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=mgRU2npX0Xu7OQuJMyr9z6u+h2sP1if1mkOz/jNZ05ITmKK7AwXgwhmsc/gz0+tkPT gLs9bgwQARRucr2Yq1Y+SYabaMpt4SDxnbOH0gA8rN4yccIh88YlOKD573gH1eX/piMd MlauU9gRm4Y0hUiia73AV/S0sSaahdEhHy4Ck= Received: by 10.223.14.150 with SMTP id g22mr3244230faa.14.1260877890766; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:51:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.40.114.110? (users.intility.com [193.71.38.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f31sm1786762fkf.42.2009.12.15.03.51.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:51:28 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: Short update: load tests and CE From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Anne_Kathrine_Petter=F8e?= In-Reply-To: <771905290912150048w2f710a7cm70cef924f85a3874@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:51:27 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9C492575-CAD4-4F91-976B-FC8F39CD8EB4@gmail.com> References: <771905290912150012n7747be85h4ca1b7dff59e6e65@mail.gmail.com> <771905290912150048w2f710a7cm70cef924f85a3874@mail.gmail.com> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Does anyone know what ESME was running on at COIL last year? It would be interesting to know as we already had ESME running on = NetWeaver. /Anne On 15. des. 2009, at 09.48, Markus Kohler wrote: > Hi Dick, > The idea was that 7.2 runs on JDK 1.6 and the chances that ESME would = run > out of the box would be higher than with 7.1 which runs on JDK 1.5. I = have > never seen ESME running on JDK1.5, and therefore I suspect that the = issue > might just be caused by the JDK version. >=20 >=20 > Regards, > Markus >=20 > "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay >=20 >=20 > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Richard Hirsch = wrote: >=20 >> I'd try using a normal 7.1 CE first. I've had enough trouble getting >> it to work in that environment. >>=20 >> D. >>=20 >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Markus Kohler = >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> Just a short update from my side >>> I tried to get some load tests running last night, and I was almost >>> successful. >>> The test is still buggy, there seems to be a multi threading issue = and >> it's >>> not exactly doing what it is supposed to do, but I got some hints = how to >> fix >>> it. >>>=20 >>> I also wanted to try to get ESME running on CE 7.20, and tried to = install >>> the latest CE version. Unfortunately that turned out to be an uphill >> battle, >>> in short it just didn't work. >>> I have to find a recent version that works on my machine. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>> Markus >>>=20 >>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay >>>=20 >>=20