Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esjewett@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=J7yz1C2S89tRYADmAjWuUq7VEuaIZQNfOcsxaFEX1Bzxnz0YmPicsmy2ur9Y6Rg2eU
         J+L4uS4mumHL9NqKRbUb9BrHdj5/fAx3uYThK8kaIt50QXct4IcSPvx1KJHZlFx5U7Js
         qhMLOikDDuYqXVbJiDSXpB66UJ7bKT6CUIWlY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A7B9AD4A-2D34-45DE-B797-468623088A45@gmail.com>
References: <AF52D905-685D-441C-B898-68C4EE7EBD12@gmail.com>
	 <771905290911281209r1e380538v651c87f53b680021@mail.gmail.com>
	 <fa2d9f450911281235ud52a4aemff6444f0c965ff34@mail.gmail.com>
	 <68f4a0e80911281311q3958416bh4cc730ac9dfcc796@mail.gmail.com>
	 <68f4a0e80911281320j6a7a2ec0ucca1139d5c5b65bb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <A7B9AD4A-2D34-45DE-B797-468623088A45@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:01:06 -0500
Message-ID: <68f4a0e80912020601g297837e0t71c979049fbdfa97@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Broken OpenID
From: Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is there any thinking around whether or not we should apply this
patch, at least temporarily?
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-111)

I ask the question because I also can't create a user on the
performance test instance of ESME, but I should be able to use an
OpenID, maybe...

Ethan

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
<akpetteroe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow, thank you for taking care of this so quickly!
>
> BTW does anyone know what happened to the user-edit page?
>
> /Anne
>
>
> On 28. nov. 2009, at 22.20, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>
>> Alrighty, I posted a patch to the Jira item that makes it work in kind
>> of a hackish way (nickname of users created from openId *is* the
>> openId itself). However, I think the real fix for this is getting the
>> user mgmt interface working again. Once that's fixed, I'm pretty sure
>> my patch can be unapplied and it'll just start working like in the
>> good old days.
>>
>> Ethan
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>>>
>>> I'm looking at fixing this now. Not going to be pretty (we need a
>>> user-edit view working again to make it work right), but I can get it
>>> working.
>>>
>>> Ethan
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I did some work on the problem last night and localized the problem
>>>> (all my "research" is in comments in the Jira item) but I have no idea
>>>> why it occurs. I just don't have enough knowledge about lift to know
>>>> why it doesn't work :-<
>>>>
>>>> =A0It is on David's list but I don't know when he'll get around to it.
>>>>
>>>> I think Anne is right and we should remove it until it works.
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Markus Kohler <markus.kohler@gmail.co=
m>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Anne,
>>>>> Makes sense to me.
>>>>> Markus
>>>>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e <
>>>>> akpetteroe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have had many trying out ESME this last week.
>>>>>> Dick and I have picked up several new users on twitter who all tried
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> sign up with the currently broken OpenID sign on.
>>>>>> I feel it gives a very bad impression of ESME to have something whic=
h
>>>>>> doesn't work already on the sign on page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will remove the OpenID field in new UI until someone has fixed the
>>>>>> problem, unless someone objects of course.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Anne
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>