Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yojibee@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.214 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=G8IAXuhSLSJMJ0BcuGMO1d2zEwGFoAXeuxy9KJ3bl113Pw7FypnMelDnOWh0BcPskX
         KuFXYrrG2HAJ25IbcZOp2MT2dW/QpaaV7/7nUvRdKSa7wBdU5kOe+enaQltiSoV6Gi7T
         RVux4Jcp0SaO0RPUm2P1LMNb2Lsnf6/KgsqfU=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Subject: Re: Short update: load tests and CE
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Anne_Kathrine_Petter=F8e?= <yojibee@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fa2d9f450912150418t1f6c87d2wb03bc965ae1ba37f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:22:19 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <336CC4D8-8A74-405D-9998-58678DB22DDB@gmail.com>
References: <771905290912150012n7747be85h4ca1b7dff59e6e65@mail.gmail.com>
 <fa2d9f450912150034g498e387cx9e5ada248b5c6e62@mail.gmail.com>
 <771905290912150048w2f710a7cm70cef924f85a3874@mail.gmail.com>
 <9C492575-CAD4-4F91-976B-FC8F39CD8EB4@gmail.com>
 <fa2d9f450912150354p70ac115clf2aca74c4070485@mail.gmail.com>
 <54283083-EE01-4FD5-9C3B-91BCD91EFE7F@gmail.com>
 <fa2d9f450912150359x7554b283gc73738f13561a3b9@mail.gmail.com>
 <771905290912150409s3cdb54c8pcfb76c3900de69e3@mail.gmail.com>
 <B89340DD-BB00-4FDC-863F-A100993FE6E9@gmail.com>
 <fa2d9f450912150418t1f6c87d2wb03bc965ae1ba37f@mail.gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org

Yes, and Markus already answered that it was just decided on the Scala =
mailing list that Scala 2.8 will run on 1.5.
So far so good. I would still like to know why we have a problem with =
JDK 1.5 though ;-)

/Anne


On 15. des. 2009, at 13.18, Richard Hirsch wrote:

> If I remember correctly, david mentioned discussions of the scala list
> about supporting 1.5. So the problem may lie there.
>=20
> D.
>=20
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
> <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ESME/lift has at least changed more in a year than NetWeaver has LOL.
>> I wanted to compare the obvious differences between all servers (not =
only NW) to see if there is anything else than the JDK we should look =
at.
>>=20
>> Markus,
>> We think that the problem is that some JDK 1.6 specific code has =
snuck into ESME.
>> David wrote this last month: "The issue *may* be that we compiled =
Lift and ESME with JDK 1.6 and perhaps a 1.6ism crept into the code. =
Anyway, I've got the source to Lift and ESME and I will make it work." =
AFAIK no one has had the time to look at this yet.
>>=20
>> /Anne
>>=20
>> On 15. des. 2009, at 13.09, Markus Kohler wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi all,
>>> As I mentioned already it also doesn't run on jetty with jdk 1.5. =
But it
>>> does run with 1.6 on a tomcat based server that I tried as well.
>>> Therefore I think it would make sense to get it running on =
jetty/tomcat on
>>> JDK 1.5 first just because then there's one unknown less
>>>=20
>>> Regards,
>>> Markus
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Richard Hirsch =
<hirsch.dick@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> I don't know what changed to causethe problem - ESME has changed a =
lot
>>>> since then - I'm assuming lift has changed as well.  I'm also =
assuming
>>>> that we were using jdk 1.6 back then as well
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
>>>> <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Yes, I know. I was just curious.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> /Anne
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On 15. des. 2009, at 12.54, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> It was the old version from Google Code.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
>>>>>> <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Does anyone know what ESME was running on at COIL last year?
>>>>>>> It would be interesting to know as we already had ESME running =
on
>>>> NetWeaver.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> /Anne
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> On 15. des. 2009, at 09.48, Markus Kohler wrote:
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Hi Dick,
>>>>>>>> The idea was that 7.2 runs on JDK 1.6 and the chances that ESME =
would
>>>> run
>>>>>>>> out of the box would be higher than with 7.1 which runs on JDK =
1.5. I
>>>> have
>>>>>>>> never seen ESME running on JDK1.5, and therefore I suspect that =
the
>>>> issue
>>>>>>>> might just be caused by the JDK version.
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan =
Kay
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Richard Hirsch <
>>>> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> I'd try using a normal  7.1 CE first. I've had enough trouble =
getting
>>>>>>>>> it to work in that environment.
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Markus Kohler <
>>>> markus.kohler@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>> Just a short update from my side
>>>>>>>>>> I tried to get some load tests running last night, and I was =
almost
>>>>>>>>>> successful.
>>>>>>>>>> The test is still buggy, there seems to be a multi threading =
issue
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>> not exactly doing what it is supposed to do, but I got some =
hints
>>>> how to
>>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> I also wanted to try to get ESME running on CE 7.20, and =
tried to
>>>> install
>>>>>>>>>> the latest CE version. Unfortunately that turned out to be an =
uphill
>>>>>>>>> battle,
>>>>>>>>>> in short it just didn't work.
>>>>>>>>>> I have to find a recent version that works on my machine.
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan =
Kay
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20