esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Markus Kohler <markus.koh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Performance update: Message size in memory
Date Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:15:17 GMT
Hi,

Yes,go ahead!
Markus
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay


On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Vassil Dichev <vdichev@apache.org> wrote:

> Markus,
>
> Good thinking- I would also suggest that we use a singleton stemmer
> for now (which would be KISS in our case).
>
> I also had some ideas to batch indexing, we could include it on our
> performance improvements list (after release 1.0?). For stemming it
> might be a better idea to have a stem cache rather than a pool of
> stemmers.
>
> Rendering does happen in the thread for the search, but I guess people
> won't notice a difference in performance normally. The other place
> where stemming happens is the word frequencies, but in the UI that is
> done as a comet snippet and pushed on demand, so there shouldn't be a
> noticeable delay.
>
> OK then, I will commit my changes today, which only involve moving
> stuff to the companion object. Of course, suggestions are welcome, but
> there's always room for improvement later on.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message