esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <>
Subject Re: SAP Services in ESME (was: UI widgets for ESME)
Date Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:54:29 GMT
On Mon December 7 2009 12:46:29 pm Bechauf, Michael wrote:
> Perhaps I did not clearly express my question. If a corporation has
> already signed, do
> their employees still individually need to sign
> once they start contributing ?

Yes.  See:

It specifically says:

For a corporation that has assigned employees to work on an Apache project, a 
Corporate CLA (CCLA) is available for contributing intellectual property via 
the corporation, that may have been assigned as part of an employment 
agreement. Note that a Corporate CLA does not remove the need for every 
developer to sign their own CLA as an individual, to cover any of their 
contributions which are not owned by the corporation signing the CCLA.

Part of the reason for that can be seen at:
Under the "Individuals compose the ASF" header.

When contributing to Apache, you are representing YOURSELF, not the company 
you are working for.   Thus, you need an ICLA on file.   


> In Eclipse, there is only one corporate agreement and developers who
> work for that corporation do not need to personally sign another,
> different agreement.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz []
> Sent: Monday, Dec 07, 2009 12:40 PM
> To: esme-dev
> Subject: Re: SAP Services in ESME (was: UI widgets for ESME)
> 2009/12/7 Bechauf, Michael <>:
> > ...are you saying that in addition to a signed CCLA, Apache also needs
> > an individiual's CLA ?...
> Of course - iCLAs are required for all Apache committers, and for
> non-committers who make "significant contributions" (whatever that
> means).
> See
> (especially "4. You represent that you are legally entitled to grant
> the above license...")
> and
> for details.
> -Bertrand

Daniel Kulp

View raw message