Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87247 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 08:17:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 08:17:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 72311 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 08:17:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72258 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 08:17:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72248 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 08:17:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:17:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hirsch.dick@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.210 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.210] (HELO mail-bw0-f210.google.com) (209.85.218.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:17:21 +0000 Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so6144629bwz.20 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:17:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=L3cpbRXSjtfZ+I49o4cNCU/9CHdR7caeTXAI8U3bLUo=; b=K5hET9E23Ho6d9epQM0ubqpRhzlQYO08TMOlopwIioshoJJ/uRlubYkAufR5p7BWAJ mKWOJ8fFfqfHjJOyWEUUh5hZ9pm3aKXEVBQZDDvNbwJ49o0SW4qgByre1psMWgeYM5Ft d3c1ybOkGnqdRkKYIM9eVuyLiQc7lRc72A2Vk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Fbi/399rH29FqHh3PIkoYLgut5gwGBGCx4/7m4GQDEZ+FeLUFYVYB+cpzJPQ3GBHdQ 53egCEdi3TEEZNr29wH1vlNBqM+IKE4EmJ4atOzy8GP1XK/4EdlPBMuoNJnoyDuwxmTL 4Kw4wWwx9f3UwXmX6fmXk8isv2Q1o/T1Ue6I0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.48.20 with SMTP id a20mr3437736muk.121.1257841020104; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:17:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:17:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Test Cases From: Richard Hirsch To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 But the question is how to do perform the UI tests during the build process. It is also possible for each developer to test the UI locally before the commits but this is very inefficient. D On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Vassil Dichev wrote: > Tests and documentation are definitely priority No.1 for me for the > next couple of months. > > From my previous experience with Cactus the framework starts the > container and connects to the test runner inside the container, which > then has all the contexts it needs. We are already doing the same > thing by running an embedded Jetty server, so I think we don't need > it. > > Vassil > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> Based on the fact that I made a build yesterday that led to a >> non-functional app on stax, I started to think about tests in general >> and the fact that we will soon need more tests to have some degree of >> quality assurance. >> >> I've started a wiki page >> (http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ESME/Tests) with test >> cases. >> >> Ideally, we should have some sort of a test driver that tests the UI >> as well during the build process. If I remember correctly, cactus has >> something like this. I'll take a look and see if I find something that >> we can use. >> >> D. >> >