Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akpetteroe@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.212 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=r1zf3KiEMfuH9MfbUdPGkl74u0ESjoxKdWhyJENNars3m2MsVXkcvlbbuqCKi073zn
         etCqtMtIIlZEQHJFseRiyPF5KyFlqfUKzfKyAF9/S+D1VRUMyVTDBEf+TtKD3n1Pl0Zy
         eTam1WkBlaoIbLQ+ZZ9jw0/+JB9u/NjayJ03k=
Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Anne_Kathrine_Petter=C3=B8e?= <yojibee@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Subject: Re: LDAP for Lift!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Anne_Kathrine_Petter=F8e?= <akpetteroe@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <68f4a0e80911290913g183d62b7iab78d2c3bb53a86a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:17:46 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <01754102-4B6A-4D54-B158-ED03087C8974@gmail.com>
References: <fa2d9f450911280058k642bb634h7eff77f21460f95e@mail.gmail.com>
 <fa2d9f450911280108v4457c5ect9363285ea445719c@mail.gmail.com>
 <fa2d9f450911280248u69bab15bn9bde3b31c65050b@mail.gmail.com>
 <B614316D-C0A3-4ABB-9757-4F31BE8A0C28@gmail.com>
 <68f4a0e80911290913g183d62b7iab78d2c3bb53a86a@mail.gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org

Just moved it to release 1.1

/Anne


On 29. nov. 2009, at 18.13, Ethan Jewett wrote:

> I just made almost this exact same comment on the Jira ticket! I think
> we should put it in Release 1.1.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e
> <akpetteroe@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is a very important feature for ESME.
>> I am wondering if we should add this to a later release (1.1 for =20
>> instance)
>> though? I feel we have more urgent issues to fix for our 1.0 release.
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME/fixforversion/12314284
>>
>> /Anne
>>
>>
>> On 28. nov. 2009, at 11.48, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>
>>> Would be very interesting to try and use this functionality to use
>>> SAP's UME.....
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Richard Hirsch =
<hirsch.dick@gmail.com=20
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Created a JIRA item (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/=20
>>>> ESME-135).
>>>>
>>>> Things that need to be considered:
>>>>
>>>> How do we use the LDAP-based roles? As a basis for pools?
>>>> Should we take user data from the LDAP? If so, how do we decide =20
>>>> which
>>>> parameters are necessary in ESME and what happens if they don't =20
>>>> exist
>>>> in the LDAP?
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hirsch =
<hirsch.dick@gmail.com=20
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://jgoday.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/lift-ldap/
>>>>>
>>>>> Need I say more......
>>>>>
>>>>> D.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>