esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anne Kathrine Petter√łe <>
Subject Re: Further analysis of the GC issue
Date Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:35:06 GMT
A couple of weeks ago we had a very interesting discussion ref  
sessions and RESTful APIs.
If you find the time, I suggest you read it as it does a good job  
explaining ESME's design.
(Read the mails which start with Markus' answer.)


On 26. nov. 2009, at 10.28, Richard Hirsch wrote:

> Good idea about having the user decide what parser to use. I'm also
> assuming that bold and italic should be enough
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Vassil Dichev <>  
> wrote:
>>> @Markus It would be interesting to remove the Textile parser and do
>>> the tests again.
>>> This would confirm whether it is the culprit or not. If I remember
>>> correctly, it was just a change in one line of code.
>>> Just found the change
>>> (

>>> )
>>> You could change the code to the older version and try it again
>> there have been a couple of changes afterwards, but just drop the
>> whole Text case and there you go.
>> I'm on it. I'll try to have just *bold* and _italic_ so far, does
>> anyone need anything else? I might also make it configurable if you
>> want to use the Textile parser and the native parser.

View raw message