Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of benewu@gmail.com designates
 209.85.211.182 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=P0NxOUIxZSLX/EWaeUFAkimw3ToFwEOo6QK/hJRGlqWynM0vs23tlqAXRmmYM/ZYgL
         yrpF2Eed7ylWrWBChqX4wotwqv+yXyNnF1QyLRoRiNWsINDmOwVsAealgsNYZkKQabRL
         J9+5V/ODcwOpx9HMSf2CRpsejOyqUbErrJN0s=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cdbebedf0910150818g21308395sd8bcdf7d971bd977@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cdbebedf0910150818g21308395sd8bcdf7d971bd977@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:23:20 +0800
Message-ID: <4db64d890910150923p43da51fo97df545d966a0bfc@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: An interesting (and correct IMHO) review of Wave
From: Xuefeng Wu <benewu@gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5c1a79e931a0475fbb2dd

--001636c5c1a79e931a0475fbb2dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Agree! Conversation is the best communication way.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:18 PM, David Pollak <
feeder.of.the.bears@gmail.com> wrote:

> Folks,
> I read this:
> http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/
>
> I think it's exactly right.
>
> I see that the difference between Wave and Twitter-visioned communication
> platforms (including ESME) is that opt-in and openness are very, very
> powerful factors.  Perhaps we can spend some time post 1.0 on the
> conversation aspects of ESME.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Surf the harmonics
>


-- 
Global R&D Center,Shanghai China,Carestream Health, Inc.
Tel:(86-21)3852 6101

--001636c5c1a79e931a0475fbb2dd--