Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92150 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2009 10:31:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2009 10:31:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 78392 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2009 10:31:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78377 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2009 10:31:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78366 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2009 10:31:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:31:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.138.12.133] (HELO mxs2.siemens.at) (194.138.12.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:31:05 +0000 Received: from vies1kbx.sie.siemens.at ([158.226.129.82]) by mxs2.siemens.at with ESMTP id n2GAUqXG018914 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:30:52 +0100 Received: from nets139a.ww300.siemens.net ([192.168.217.3]) by vies1kbx.sie.siemens.at (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.1) with ESMTP id n2GAUimZ023354 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:30:44 +0100 Received: from nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net ([158.226.250.79]) by nets139a.ww300.siemens.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:30:43 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: AW: Esme Presentation...? [WAS Re: The current state of ESME] Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:30:42 +0100 Message-ID: <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E16607CB9E9D@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Esme Presentation...? [WAS Re: The current state of ESME] Thread-Index: AcmmIEFoNKjhq624SGSDGG6VtETdXgAAZlig References: From: "Hirsch, Richard" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2009 10:30:43.0358 (UTC) FILETIME=[429EEBE0:01C9A622] X-purgate: clean X-purgate: This mail is considered clean X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-Ad: Checked for Spam by eleven - eXpurgate www.eXpurgate.net X-purgate-ID: 149917::090316113052-04DC8BA0-50305E8D/0-0/0-15 X-purgate-size: 1969/999999 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How long are the presentations?=20 Do you want more of a technical focus or use-case focus?=20 D.=20 -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com]=20 Gesendet: Montag, 16. M=E4rz 2009 11:16 An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Esme Presentation...? [WAS Re: The current state of ESME] On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> wrote: >>> ...i'll be at ApacheConEU. the >>> FastFeather track is a good way to attract interest within Apache - >>> the crowds are small but influential. i think we could pull together = a >>> talk which either myself or Bertrand could give.... > > Got the answer ApacheCon Planners: the FastFeather track as we know it > is not happening this year in Amsterdam, but the place for last-minute > talks is the BarCamp (http://barcamp.org/BarCampApache) which is > colocated with ApacheCon, Tuesday March 23rd. > > I won't be there unfortunately, arriving in Amsterdam Tuesday evening > only due to other commitments. i'll be there, and also at BarCampApacheOxford a week or so later. if the community thinks that it's worthwhile and could find time to help me write something over the next week or so, then i'd be happy to talk about Esme. opinions? if we want to give this a try, i prefer to use S5 which is based on HTML, CSS and JavaScript. being text, it plays well with version control systems. this makes it easier to collaborate on presentations. it's pubilc domain so there'd be no problem checked into the apache repository as documentation. alternatively, i use a google project for creative commons presentations so that's another place the content could be developed. opinions? - robert