Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of feeder.of.the.bears@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.20 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=C61smazwFXP+khWUpYJ01eyrftGP6MV3WKC2SLTtA5wA1K5YTyRptxHNIBM2pdL0QW
         Zpxl3AzFT3dsRk0aFSFWp2vUrTthleKWsYyUUfyNcWbVYF7iGw685S5dDUzLb7t/aydc
         Yv1dvdb48GUdFjWImEDmPRsi/k9xj8UnmKGm8=
Message-ID: <cdbebedf0901120644n151b73far609478dedd62d8ab@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:44:09 -0800
From: "David Pollak" <feeder.of.the.bears@gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ESME Loadtest results for your review
In-Reply-To: 
 <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F67@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_283175_6434581.1231771449251"
References: <2bca8c350901120600x212bb23fk16e5a2ac8085f889@mail.gmail.com>
	 <cdbebedf0901120628i4fa5b40cl4c8343c4f7abbc33@mail.gmail.com>
	 <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F67@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net>

------=_Part_283175_6434581.1231771449251
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Hirsch, Richard <richard.hirsch@siemens.co=
m
> wrote:

> This first test was  based on the old Google Code war file which means
> Scala 2.7.2 was used.
>
> We will test again when ESME with Scala 2.7.3 release comes out. I think
> the most important fact is that we will have an environment where we can
> test plus the test scripts. When we get a new ESME version based on Scala
> 2.7.3, we will then have a basis for comparison.
>
> I think it is important that we show such reports as another example of o=
ur
> "open" character.


I agree that transparency in code and performance is good.


>
>
> D.
>
> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: David Pollak [mailto:feeder.of.the.bears@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 12. J=E4nner 2009 15:28
> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: ESME Loadtest results for your review
>
> Daniel,
> If the build was against Scala 2.7.2, there's a problem.  2.7.2 has a
> reference leak related to Scala Actors (Actors sit underneath most of
> ESME).
>  Scala 2.7.3 fixes the problem and will likely be released this week.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Daniel Koller <dakoller@googlemail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I posted the first draft of the loadtest evaluation at
> >
> >
> http://esmeproject.googlecode.com/files/20090111_esmeloadtest_summary2.pd=
ffor
> > your review.
> >
> > Please give me feedback if you miss information in it, or if you think =
we
> > should put clearer emphasis on some facts before communicate it
> > "externally".
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > --
> > ---
> > Daniel Koller
> > Jahnstrasse 20
> > 80469 M=FCnchen * dakoller@googlemail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some: http://github.com/dpp
>


--=20
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp

------=_Part_283175_6434581.1231771449251--