Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yojibee@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.20 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :x-mailer;
        b=xfS40KXlHMAZMkvRroIdXiZ5NkQsJKsmvdFezFun31Liltl8FvGX01SOlukPmWs5+b
         d/5wP5Ti+HD522JVYP/PJTw+uw+MkwLprDlQjEMr5Iwy6RK87P/CTuIS4Nq874j+hUno
         Taz5BQMp0l2BjXADufqdojQzVDNDUsnnVAeAo=
Message-Id: <B869CAA4-125B-4C4F-BE1D-19C528995FC5@gmail.com>
From: Anne Kathrine Petteroe <yojibee@gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: 
 <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F42@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Web UI options
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:01:18 +0100
References: <f767f0600901050111j7accd17fo73fdc0afb7c628e6@mail.gmail.com>
 <cdbebedf0901050647x674a656cq18596fff3d96face@mail.gmail.com>
 <f767f0600901060027q5bc9574bld2bd7d1d1d28dc9e@mail.gmail.com>
 <c7fc82820901060514q7a390f39pc89e8ad607961454@mail.gmail.com>
 <9AA5AADC-0B71-4306-BCE4-D981549D3F74@gmail.com>
 <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F3F@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net>
 <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F40@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net>
 <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F41@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net>
 <48d391a20901070047i2a01be70o3afcfc4a443fe79e@mail.gmail.com>
 <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F42@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net>

Do we have the UI Mrinal created last autumn hosted somewhere?
And if not, could we?
I really need a better looking UI than the one which is up on esme.us =20=

now for demo purposes in the next coming weeks.

- Anne

On 7. jan.. 2009, at 09.49, Hirsch, Richard wrote:

> I agree.
>
> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Mrinal Wadhwa [mailto:mrinal.wadhwa@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. J=E4nner 2009 09:47
> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Web UI options
>
> +1  Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?
>
> I don't think an intermediate UI would be worth the effort
>
> Mrinal
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Hirsch, Richard
> <richard.hirsch@siemens.com>wrote:
>
>>> * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?
>> +1
>>
>> D.
>>
>> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Hirsch, Richard
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. J=E4nner 2009 09:18
>> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Betreff: [VOTE] Web UI options
>>
>> Last night on the scrum call, we were discussing various options =20
>> for the
>> Web UI and I wanted to summarize what we were discussing and ask the
>> community on what option we should follow.
>>
>> -Situation-
>>
>> We currently have a Web UI running at the main ESME server at
>> http://esme.us. This version is very early iteration and has various
>> issues associated with it.  It is also based on the old core code =20
>> based
>> at the Google Code site.  We now have a new new ESME core code base
>> which is located at Apache. This version of the code at Apache is the
>> most recent code base and includes a better split between UI and =20
>> server
>> code. The Apache version, however, currently doesn't have UI code in
>> such maturity that we could use it to replace the existing Web site =20=

>> at
>> esme.us.  Bill has also created a description of a new ESME UI which
>> probably depicts what the next UI is going to look like. This
>> description is currently incomplete inasmuch as certain UI features =20=

>> are
>> still not depicted.
>>
>> -Vote-
>>
>> The vote deals with the decision whether we want to build an
>> intermediary Web-UI based on the existing Apache Core or whether we =20=

>> want
>> to skip the intermediary Web UI and focus on the "BillF" UI?
>>
>> Choices (Please Vote!):
>>
>> * Create an intermediary UI
>>
>> * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?
>>
>> Once the community makes a decision on this issue, we will define the
>> associated tasks to support the decision.
>>
>> Dick
>>
>>
>>