Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: AW: ESME Loadtest results for your review
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:12:38 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E16607A1A0A7@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net>
In-Reply-To: <2bca8c350901130113g41fbca84ge5c2eb85cada01b5@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: ESME Loadtest results for your review
Thread-Index: Acl1XzqKqdWlwZcqTjuq+3gIzWUNqQHwjijw
References: <2bca8c350901120600x212bb23fk16e5a2ac8085f889@mail.gmail.com>
 <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F6D@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net>
 <2bca8c350901130113g41fbca84ge5c2eb85cada01b5@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Hirsch, Richard" <richard.hirsch@siemens.com>
To: <esme-dev@incubator.apache.org>

@Daniel:

I'd like to publish the results in the ESME blog. Could you just add the =
one page with the test basis and then I will publish it.

D.=20

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Daniel Koller [mailto:dakoller@googlemail.com]=20
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. J=E4nner 2009 10:13
An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ESME Loadtest results for your review

Hi all,

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Hirsch, Richard =
<richard.hirsch@siemens.com
> wrote:

> I think we need to add details like: which source we used. I'd also =
like a
> note one of the first pages, saying that this ESME version includes a =
Scala
> library that includes a known major bug involving memory allocation =
which
> detrimentally affected the test results.  Just to avoid giving others =
the
> ability to take this report and say "Look. ESME is unstable and has =
poor
> performance."


ok, will include a page explaining detail the test basis.

>
>
> We also need a simple description of the type of test that were =
performed -
> how many clients, etc.
>
> The link for the loadtester source code is also incorrect.

right, I just need to upload the Eclipse project.

>
>
> Maybe for later tests we do capacity tests where you start with one =
user
> for minutes and then an additional user every 20 seconds up to 50 =
users and
> then have a ramp-down.  We could combine this with more complicated =
test
> scenarios to get even better results.

yes, this is possible: can provide a changed test script.

>
>
> Otherwise, I think it is a great start and I can't wait to get a =
released
> version so that I can blog about it.
>
> D.
>
> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Daniel Koller [mailto:dakoller@googlemail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 12. J=E4nner 2009 15:00
> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: ESME Loadtest results for your review
>
> Hi all,
>
> I posted the first draft of the loadtest evaluation at
>
> =
http://esmeproject.googlecode.com/files/20090111_esmeloadtest_summary2.pd=
ffor
> your review.
>
> Please give me feedback if you miss information in it, or if you think =
we
> should put clearer emphasis on some facts before communicate it
> "externally".
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> ---
> Daniel Koller
> Jahnstrasse 20
> 80469 M=FCnchen * dakoller@googlemail.com
>


--=20
---
Daniel Koller
Jahnstrasse 20
80469 M=FCnchen * dakoller@googlemail.com