esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hirsch, Richard" <richard.hir...@siemens.com>
Subject AW: [VOTE] Web UI options
Date Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:49:07 GMT
I agree.  

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Mrinal Wadhwa [mailto:mrinal.wadhwa@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Jänner 2009 09:47
An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Web UI options

+1  Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?

I don't think an intermediate UI would be worth the effort

Mrinal



On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Hirsch, Richard
<richard.hirsch@siemens.com>wrote:

> >* Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?
> +1
>
> D.
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Hirsch, Richard
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Jänner 2009 09:18
> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: [VOTE] Web UI options
>
> Last night on the scrum call, we were discussing various options for the
> Web UI and I wanted to summarize what we were discussing and ask the
> community on what option we should follow.
>
> -Situation-
>
> We currently have a Web UI running at the main ESME server at
> http://esme.us. This version is very early iteration and has various
> issues associated with it.  It is also based on the old core code based
> at the Google Code site.  We now have a new new ESME core code base
> which is located at Apache. This version of the code at Apache is the
> most recent code base and includes a better split between UI and server
> code. The Apache version, however, currently doesn't have UI code in
> such maturity that we could use it to replace the existing Web site at
> esme.us.  Bill has also created a description of a new ESME UI which
> probably depicts what the next UI is going to look like. This
> description is currently incomplete inasmuch as certain UI features are
> still not depicted.
>
> -Vote-
>
> The vote deals with the decision whether we want to build an
> intermediary Web-UI based on the existing Apache Core or whether we want
> to skip the intermediary Web UI and focus on the "BillF" UI?
>
> Choices (Please Vote!):
>
> * Create an intermediary UI
>
> * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?
>
> Once the community makes a decision on this issue, we will define the
> associated tasks to support the decision.
>
> Dick
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message