empire-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Francis De Brabandere <franci...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: New release necessary?
Date Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:46:10 GMT
Should I create an other RC on sunday (or monday) evening or do we
want to wait for some more reviews on the general@ list?

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Francis De Brabandere
<francisdb@gmail.com> wrote:
> I got this fixed by adding deployment skipping for our examples module:
> <build>
>               <pluginManagement>
>                       <plugins>
>                               <plugin>
>                                       <!-- skip deployment for
all examples -->
>                      <artifactId>maven-deploy-plugin</artifactId>
>                      <configuration>
>                        <skip>true</skip>
>                     </configuration>
>                   </plugin>
>           </plugins>
>               </pluginManagement>
> </build>
>
> As you can see in the latest snapshot builds the examples are not
> being deployed any more:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/empire-db/
>
> Now for the staging repo I fear we'll have to create an other RC as I
> can not remove folders there.
>
> Cheers,
> Francis
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Francis De Brabandere
> <francisdb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was thinking the same thing. There seems to be a way to disable a
>> deploy, we could then skip deployment to the staging repository for
>> all examples
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Francis
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Rainer Döbele <doebele@esteam.de> wrote:
>>> Hi Francis,
>>>
>>> OK the two war files in the Maven staging area are wrong.
>>>
>>> But can't we just delete them.
>>> Everything else should be OK.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Rainer
>>>
>>>
>>> Rainer Döbele wrote:
>>>> re: About the war (sounds funny, doesn't it)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, shame on me.
>>>> It's in the Maven staging area as sebb said.
>>>> Should have read it properly.
>>>> Well, that is not so good I must admit.
>>>>
>>>> Are any examples required in the stating area at all?
>>>> Isn't this what is supposed to go into a public repository.
>>>> So wouldn't empire-db-core and empire-db-struts2 be sufficient?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Rainer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rainer Döbele wrote:
>>>> > re: About the war (sounds funny, doesn't it)
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi Francis,
>>>> >
>>>> > I still don't see the problem. The war is not in the release and hence
>>>> > there is no problem.
>>>> >
>>>> > Rainer
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> > > Von: Francis De Brabandere [mailto:francisdb@gmail.com]
>>>> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 11. September 2009 22:19
>>>> > > An: empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> > > Betreff: Re: About the war (sounds funny, doesn't it)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I just added an other reply to the thread, we could just release
the
>>>> > > source for those. I do agree that war has no value.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > It's just a side-effect of maven that he builds a binary for each
>>>> > > module. I'll try to find a solution for that...
>>>> > > Sorry about this, I did not think it was going to be this big of
an
>>>> > > issue...
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Cheers,
>>>> > > Francis
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Rainer Döbele <doebele@esteam.de>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > > > Hi Francis,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > there is no war file in the distribution is there?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > But IMO we don't have to let Maven build one either.
>>>> > > > What is it good for?
>>>> > > > People usually run the web app from their IDE.
>>>> > > > So if this would be a problem, we just won't build one.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > But I really think (and hope) that sebb had some other problem.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Regards
>>>> > > > Rainer
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>>>> > > >> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> >> >  [X] -1
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>  Distribution archives are broken.
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> > Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license
and
>>>> > notice
>>>> > > >> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L?
How do you want
>>>> us
>>>> > > >> to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future.
If one
>>>> of
>>>> > > >> the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we
also have to
>>>> > > >> add it, there is no easy way to handle this?
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> --
>>>> > > >> http://www.somatik.be
>>>> > > >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole
house.
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --
>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > http://www.somatik.be
>>>> > > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.somatik.be
>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>



-- 
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.

Mime
View raw message