empire-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rainer Döbele <doeb...@esteam.de>
Subject re: Distribution
Date Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:15:13 GMT
Yep. I am off to bed now. Until tomorrow.

Rainer

Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Re: Distribution
> 
> on second thought, sources are handy for the examples
> 
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Francis De
> Brabandere<francisdb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > already fixed that inceptionyear in trunk, is 2008 ok?
> >
> > we can always link to the javadoc/src/jar from the site (link to
> maven
> > central repo)
> >
> > I think we need to think about who will download the distribution and
> > what they will expect but maybe we can tackle this in a next release?
> > Most people using maven will never download the distribution. They
> > will just add the artifacts in their pom or check out svn.
> >
> >> [INFO] Using Eclipse Workspace: null
> > I suppose this is not a problem, maybe null is the default workspace?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Francis
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Rainer Döbele<doebele@esteam.de>
> wrote:
> >> Hi Francis,
> >>
> >> Yes, the previous distribution (empire-db-2.0.4) contained the
> javadoc in the docs subdirectory.
> >> Personally I think it's not a must, but it won't hurt to provide it
> either.
> >>
> >> When I build the sources using "mvn clean install eclipse:eclipse"
> it's always coming up with an info saying "inceptionYear not specified,
> defaulting to 2009". Is this anything that's worth fixing?
> >> And I also get the message: "[INFO] Using Eclipse Workspace: null"
> which I don't know what it means.
> >> I guess this has been around for a while but I have just failed to
> notice so far.
> >> So if this is OK there is no reason to bother.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Rainer
> >>
> >>
> >> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> >>> Re: Distribution
> >>>
> >>> did we have javadoc in the distribution before?
> >>>
> >>> I think the distribution is ok
> >>>
> >>> In fact the distribution is only for people not using maven, they
> have
> >>> sources and jar's. I don't think they'll be needing anything else?
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Rainer Döbele<doebele@esteam.de>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Thanks Francis,
> >>> >
> >>> > this is our first Maven based release so I nobody (probably)
> expects
> >>> everything to work at the first attempt.
> >>> >
> >>> > If there is anything I can do please let me know.
> >>> >
> >>> > Patiently waiting...
> >>> > Rainer
> >>> >
> >>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> >>> >> re: Distribution
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Dist build needs to be redone. Will take care of that.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> http://www.somatik.be
> >>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.somatik.be
> > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.

Mime
View raw message