edgent-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject Re: maven and distribution bundles with transitive deps: licensing&notice
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:24:14 GMT
Hi John,

Is this considered a best-practice at Apache? I remember us having a similar discussion at
the Flex project and we settled with not checking in the jar and not using maven wrapper.

Chris

Am 12.07.17, 15:11 schrieb "John D. Ament" <johndament@apache.org>:

    On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
    wrote:
    
    > Well the problem is, the wrapper would require us to check in a jar and
    > that’s a no-go for an Apache release.
    >
    
    you can check in JARs to the repo.  Just exclude it from the source release.
    
    
    >
    > There seems to be long-going discussions on the maven-wrapper page about
    > such a no-deps update. Right now, I think the most promising solution would
    > be to extend the mvnw scripts to check if the jar is present and if it’s
    > not, to compile a single java class and run it locally. This would then
    > download the jar and place it where the wrapper expects it to be. In that
    > case only sources would be checked in and the only dependency needed would
    > be to have a JDKs bin directory on the systems path (Which is needed for
    > almost everything else anyway).
    >
    > Unfortunately, I am totally at war with platform (independent)
    > shell-scripts. Sort of have the same love for them as for regular
    > expressions ;-)
    >
    > Volunteers to look into this?
    >
    > Chris
    >
    >
    > Am 12.07.17, 14:34 schrieb "Dale LaBossiere" <dml.apache@gmail.com>:
    >
    >     The wrapper sounds like a win (we currently leverage the gradle
    > wrapper to ease the pain).
    >
    >     I’m continuing to tweak the script for j7/android.
    >
    >     > On Jul 11, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Christofer Dutz <
    > christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
    >     >
    >     > I'm not demanding the assembly ... It was just the last missing part
    > in the migration to Maven. Most ASF projects provide such convenience
    > binary archives, but an ASF release is the source only anyway.
    >     >
    >     > I admit that your script would do the job.
    >     >
    >     > Another thing worth looking into might be the Maven wrapper, which
    > would eliminate the need to download Maven, as someone not wanting to use
    > Maven would have to install Maven in order to NOT use it afterwards ;-) ...
    > Users using Maven wouldn't use the script.
    >     >
    >     > Chris
    >
    >
    >
    >
    

Mime
View raw message