edgent-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dale LaBossiere <dml.apa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [GitHub] incubator-edgent pull request #231: [Edgent-272] source: conform to license&...
Date Wed, 09 Nov 2016 19:53:06 GMT
I’m updating the PR for your review.

Is there some acceptable way to reduce the bloat / duplication in LICENSE for MIT / BSD licenses
that differ only in copyrights for different files?
Is what’s there now exactly how you recommend it should be?

— Dale

> On Nov 9, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Dale LaBossiere <dml.apache@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> So it sounds like those copyright notices should be kept with their license text that's
been added to LICENSE.
> Looking fwd to your clarification / confirmation!
> 
> — Dale
> 
>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:14 PM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Looking better but but in general only copyrights that have be relocated (like via
a software grant) should go into NOTICE. [1] It’s confusing and a lot of projects (even
TLP) are unclear about this.
>> 
>> I should have some time later today (my time) to take a look.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>> 
>> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message