edgent-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Cazen Lee (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (EDGENT-268) Change licensing header in gradle files
Date Thu, 13 Oct 2016 06:33:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15571024#comment-15571024
] 

Cazen Lee commented on EDGENT-268:
----------------------------------

When I insert a License header at first time, I was working with reference to the [Apache
Aurora|https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/build.gradle]. However, I find that the
most of the project using the [2] header when I try to search again.

But, same as Justin's opnion and following to the document that you mentioned, The purpose
of [1] is intended to grant the Copyright and the Apache Licence to work that has been already
created outside the ASF(APPLY THE APACHE LICENSE TO YOUR WORK)

I think that [2] is looks good on the work of the ASF(HEADERS FOR CODE DEVELOPED AT THE ASF).


> Change licensing header in gradle files
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: EDGENT-268
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-268
>             Project: Edgent
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Miscellaneous
>            Reporter: Dale LaBossiere
>
> The gradle files have ASF license headers but they are of the form specified in [1].
 The rest of the source files (java, shell) use the form specified in [2].
> Are the gradle files OK or do they need to be changed to use [2]?
> [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> From Justin: I would go with [2].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message