edgent-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dale LaBossiere (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (QUARKS-154) ControlService "type" rules/conventions
Date Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:23:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QUARKS-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15258269#comment-15258269
] 

Dale LaBossiere commented on QUARKS-154:
----------------------------------------

[~vdogaru] asks: Would it make sense to register the control against a class type rather than
a String?

``<T> String registerControl(Class<?> type, String id, String alias, Class<T>
controlInterface, T control)``
Where the type parameter is the type of object controlled by the MBean.


> ControlService "type" rules/conventions
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QUARKS-154
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QUARKS-154
>             Project: Quarks
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Dale LaBossiere
>            Priority: Minor
>
> ControlService is documented as being usable by applications (as well as Quarks).  
> Its documentation needs to be improved so applications know the rules/conventions for
choosing "type" values they register their mbeans with so as to avoid collisions - e.g., with
the values that the runtime is using.  Right now the runtime isn't doing anything to qualify
the type names it's using (e.g., "job").
> Rules/conventions for "identifier" values are also needed for avoiding collisions.  e.g.,
runtime uses JOB_<n>  Also need to clarify if it's legal for multiple registrations
(different beans) for the same "id" and/or alias.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message