Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-drill-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-drill-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0773C1876E for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26008 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2015 21:41:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-drill-issues-archive@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 25985 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2015 21:41:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@drill.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@drill.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 25974 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2015 21:41:00 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:41:00 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:41:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jinfeng Ni (JIRA)" To: issues@drill.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (DRILL-3246) Query planning support for partition by clause in Drill's CTAS statement MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596697#comment-14596697 ] Jinfeng Ni commented on DRILL-3246: ----------------------------------- Here is what I found with respect of partitioning clause in CTAS, in Oracle, MySQL, DB2. 1. Oracle [1] : partition by clause before SELECT statement. {code} [ column_properties ] [ table_partitioning_clauses ] [ CACHE | NOCACHE ] [ parallel_clause ] [ ROWDEPENDENCIES | NOROWDEPENDENCIES ] [ enable_disable_clause ] [ enable_disable_clause ]... [ row_movement_clause ] [ AS subquery ] {code} Actually, the link lead me to the wrong conclusion has an example, which I just missed completely. (my bad). 2. MySQL[2] : partition by clause before SELECT statement. {code} CREATE [TEMPORARY] TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] tbl_name [(create_definition,...)] [table_options] [partition_options] select_statement {code} 3. DB2 LUW[3]: Partition by clause after SELECT statement. Although the ordering is different for Oracle /DB2, both seem to restrict the partitioning expression to be a column in the targeted table, represented as an unqualified name. MySql seems to be different in that it allows general expression in the partitioning expression. Looks like neither of the above three allows to use ordinal column reference in partition by clause. However, if the ordinal reference is refer to the column list (explicitly or implicitly) of target table, then it should be fine to support ordinal reference, except for the case of select * in schema-less query. The ordinal reference would not work for "ORDER BY" when select clause has * from schema-less table. To summary, 3 systems put partition by clause before SELECT statement, 1 system does the opposite. Only RedShift seems to support ordinal reference in partitioning by clause. [1]. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_7002.htm#i2215406 [2]. https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/create-table.html [3]. https://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_9.7.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.sql.ref.doc/doc/r0000927.html?cp=SSEPGG_9.7.0%2F2-10-6-90 > Query planning support for partition by clause in Drill's CTAS statement > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: DRILL-3246 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3246 > Project: Apache Drill > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Query Planning & Optimization > Affects Versions: 1.0.0 > Reporter: Jinfeng Ni > Assignee: Jinfeng Ni > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > We are going to add "PARTITION BY" clause in Drill's CTAS statement. The "PARTITION BY" clause will specify the list of columns out of the result table's column list that will be used to partition the data. > CREATE TABLE table_name [ (col_name, .... ) ] > [PARTITION BY (col_name, ...)] > AS SELECT_STATEMENT; > Semantics restriction for the PARTITION BY clause: > - All the columns in the PARTITION BY clause have to be in the table's column list, or the SELECT_STATEMENT has a * column, when the base table in the SELECT_STATEMENT is schema-less. Otherwise, an query validation error would be raised. > - When the partition column is resolved to * column in a schema-less query, this * column could not be a result of join operation. This restriction is added, since for * out of join operation, query planner would not know which table might produce this partition column. > Example : > {code} > create table mytable1 partition by (r_regionkey) as > select r_regionkey, r_name from cp.`tpch/region.parquet` > {code} > {code} > create table mytable2 partition by (r_regionkey) as > select * from cp.`tpch/region.parquet` > {code} > {code} > create table mytable3 partition by (r_regionkey) as > select r.r_regionkey, r.r_name, n.n_nationkey, n.n_name > from cp.`tpch/nation.parquet` n, cp.`tpch/region.parquet` r > where n.n_regionkey = r.r_regionkey > {code} > Invalid case 1: Partition column is not in table's column list. > {code} > create table mytable4 partition by (r_regionkey2) as > select r_regionkey, r_name from cp.`tpch/region.parquet` > {code} > Invalid case 2: Partition column is resolved to * out of a join operator. > {code} > create table mytable5 partition by (r_regionkey) as > select * > from cp.`tpch/nation.parquet` n, cp.`tpch/region.parquet` r > where n.n_regionkey = r.r_regionkey > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)