drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Subbu Srinivasan <ssriniva...@zscaler.com>
Subject Re: Time for a 1.9 Release?
Date Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:53:36 GMT
+1.

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Paul Rogers <progers@maprtech.com> wrote:

> For release numbers, 1.10 (then 1.11, 1.12, …) seems like a good idea.
>
> At first it may seem odd to go to 1.10 from 1.9. Might people get confused
> between 1.10 and 1.1.0? But, there is precedence. Tomcat’s latest 7-series
> release is 7.0.72. Java is on 8u112. And so on.
>
> I like the idea of moving to 2.0 later when the team introduces a major
> change, rather than by default just because the numbers roll around. For
> example, Hadoop when to 2.x when YARN was introduced. Impala appears to
> have moved to 2.0 when they added Spill to disk for some (all?) operators.
>
> - Paul
>
> > On Oct 28, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Sudheesh Katkam <sudheesh@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Drillers,
> >
> > We have a reasonable number of fixes and features since the last release
> > [1]. Releasing itself takes a while; so I propose we start the 1.9
> release
> > process.
> >
> > I volunteer as the release manager, unless there are objections.
> >
> > We should also discuss what the release version number should be after
> 1.9.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Sudheesh
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL/fixforversion/12337861
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message