drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Givre <cgi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Time for a 1.9 Release?
Date Sun, 30 Oct 2016 00:02:42 GMT
+1 on a release and +1 on DRILL-3423 - Add New HTTPD format plugin, but I may be biased on
that one ;-)

> On Oct 29, 2016, at 14:27, Laurent Goujon <laurent@dremio.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have several JIRAs regarding metadata I worked on recently and would like
> to see resolved before 1.9:
> 
> - DRILL-1268: Add unit test to C++ native client
> - DRILL-4853: Update C++ protobuf source files
> - DRILL-4420: C++ API for metadata access and prepared statements
> - DRILL-1996: Add cancel method to Drill C++ connector
> 
> Those changes are all part of PR #602 (
> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/602) and have been reviewed by Parth.
> 
> - DRILL-4730: Update JDBC DatabaseMetaData implementation to use new
> Metadata APIs
> This is PR #613 (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/613), and is waiting
> for some reviews
> 
> - DRILL-4945: Report INTERVAL exact type as column type name
> This is PR #618 (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/618), and is waiting
> for some reviews
> 
> - DRILL-4969: Basic implementation of display size for column metadata
> This is PR #632 (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/632), and is waiting
> for some reviews
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Laurent
> 
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Parth Chandra <pchandra@maprtech.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 on doing a release.
>> 
>> I'm hoping the following get a +1 :
>> 
>> DRILL-4800 - Improve parquet reader performance
>> DRILL-3423 - Add New HTTPD format plugin
>> DRILL-4858 - REPEATED_COUNT on JSON containing an array of maps
>> 
>> Specifically what did you want to discuss about the release number after
>> 1.9?  Ordinarily you would just go to 2.0. The only reason for holding off
>> on 2.0, that I can think of, is if you want to make breaking changes in the
>> 2.0 release and those are not going to be ready for the next release cycle.
>> Are any dev's planning on such breaking changes? If so we should discuss
>> that (or any other reason we might have for deferring 2.0) in a separate
>> thread?
>> I'm +0 on any version number we chose.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Sudheesh Katkam <sudheesh@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Let's aim for EOD next Friday (11/04/16) to get all changes in; I will
>> try
>>> to get RC0 out on Monday (11/07/16).
>>> 
>>> Current list of commits:
>>> 
>>> [Sudheesh]
>>> + DRILL-4280: pull request being reviewed
>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/578
>>> 
>>> [Jinfeng]
>>> + DRILL-1950: pull request pending
>>> 
>>> Any other pull requests that developers would like to get into the
>> release?
>>> Please post the status too.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Sudheesh
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Jinfeng Ni <jni@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> I'm working on DRILL-1950 to support parquet row group level filter
>>>> pruning. I plan to submit a pull request for code review in 1-2 days,
>>>> hopefully.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Aman Sinha <amansinha@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Sudheesh Katkam <
>> sudheesh@apache.org
>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Drillers,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We have a reasonable number of fixes and features since the last
>>> release
>>>>>> [1]. Releasing itself takes a while; so I propose we start the 1.9
>>>> release
>>>>>> process.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I volunteer as the release manager, unless there are objections.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We should also discuss what the release version number should be
>> after
>>>> 1.9.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Sudheesh
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL/
>>> fixforversion/12337861
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message