Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54DC2186D4 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70266 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2016 20:20:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 70213 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2016 20:20:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@drill.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@drill.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 70201 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2016 20:20:31 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:20:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F2BF9C1F62 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:20:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.879 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=maprtech.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ehbfkG1gHaCd for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f52.google.com (mail-lf0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E94D320CC8 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c192so124845959lfe.2 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:20:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=maprtech.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vvLqo6CL6IsTNhumbd5eJN1WXZhSotD1cHFhRNEw90I=; b=JwE1YWqaVxLjgJjn35aYHh7MD6Gj0M7XG5qEqx83n2HZ0qWQNXk55F2gVPsVi9axDl Lu76OkfwvwHg6YxL3gBje+a3yW/3VrR72RONPaAjaBw6eUDU9RoEFrc9aEn1jhQKPGAH zXbqy6NOpseRzdrREl49TwNWpc5ORrvs4YoIk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vvLqo6CL6IsTNhumbd5eJN1WXZhSotD1cHFhRNEw90I=; b=fUy0t73EcNHbM9XJMp9Kr8GuZ6HBfqjVtN6ciMzDhSxD82ckzNBOKQ5+/VzUzffzt3 rE7gx4v88S3tTmGHbIn4dNS6cT2nQN3rFF1JqXcE78CPd9qktgFyU6ECrCaknUA4iqOf RuEsGs6BsIpVjpTzpYMNauuSgA2XaVqTifNgmdhwd0+lm03nQSEN3afshzzlbfqOHwCr QD+LS+OaFzLPxDu7taRS6RseslXihqM4UTbGzKTij9K4IVjUzdr3KrYYa/Grdbj79Nh9 GV5kgAHB6BZI8TbS2yyUai50NPNFOKNwqWkl95T/Vt7SVkkRCmvG2Ji6tm9xkfI8DFXO uuEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk84zY22aWL/+/yJ+d5/JxhuUHPSP5jxorfsoPQNH4YHRtjjYYobyv7gNr5gbU1h7AaQNB91ZhW8GKtj4j8iHVCagM4oQ5uec8UNE0F9MPGsnVHlWY= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.136.139 with SMTP id k133mr34918358lfd.4.1452025228262; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:20:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.148.66 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:20:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:20:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Time for a 1.5 release? From: Kristine Hahn To: dev@drill.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f3894ef96e405289bf7f9 --001a113f3894ef96e405289bf7f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4239 (Drill reported not to work on 32-bit Windows) has been opened as a doc bug, but maybe we're actually talking about a product bug. If so, how about a fix in 1.5? Kristine Hahn Sr. Technical Writer 415-497-8107 @krishahn skype:krishahn On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jason Altekruse wrote: > Hello All, > > With the allocator changes merged and about a month since the last release > I think it would be good to start a vote soon. I would like to volunteer to > be release manager. > > I know that there were some issues that were identified after the transfer > patch was merged. I think that these issues should be fixed before we cut a > release candidate. > > From looking at the associated JIRAs it looked like there was a possible > short term fix just adjusting the max_query_memory_per_node option, and > some more involved work to change how we determine the correct time to > spill during external sort. I believe it makes sense to make external sort > work well with the newly improved memory accounting before cutting a > release, but I'm not sure how much work is left to be done there. [1] > > Please respond with your thoughts on a release soon and any JIRAs you would > like to include in the release. > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243 > > Thanks, > Jason > --001a113f3894ef96e405289bf7f9--