drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com>
Subject Re: Time for a 1.5 release?
Date Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:31:46 GMT
I got clean regression runs as well. I've merged the patch.

Jason, you want to start the release process?

--
Jacques Nadeau
CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Abhishek Girish <agirish@mapr.com> wrote:

> Had two clean Functional runs. TPC-H SF100 was also successful.
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:07 PM, rahul challapalli <
> challapallirahul@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Kicked off a functional run with your branch. Will let you know once it
> > finishes
> >
> > - Rahul
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > 4196 was merged today. I have an updated patch for 4291 that is ready.
> > > Unfortunately, it seems that something isn't working with our extended
> > > tests so I haven't been able to run an extended regression. Unit tests
> > > pass. Is someone else possibly able to run a regression suite against
> > this
> > > branch [1] so we can confirm things look good and start the release
> > > process?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Jacques
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jacques Nadeau
> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think the main things are 4196 and 4291 should be completed. I know
> > > Amit
> > > > was able to reproduce 4196 locally this weekend so I think we're
> close
> > on
> > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jacques Nadeau
> > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zelaine Fong <zfong@maprtech.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Any updates on this?  What's blocking us from taking this to a vote
> --
> > > the
> > > >> sort merge join issues?
> > > >>
> > > >> -- Zelaine
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Bumping this thread...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Here are the issues that were mentioned in this thread along
with
> a
> > > >> > proposed categorization:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Release Blockers
> > > >> > In-progress Amit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190
> > > >> > In-progress Amit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196
> > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246
> > > >> > In-review Jinfeng
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256
> > > >> > In-progress Jacques
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278
> > > >> > Ready to merge Laurent
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285
> > > >> > Nice to Have
> > > >> > Open Jason/Hakim https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247
> > > >> > In-progress Jason
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203
> > > >> > Open Jacques https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266
> > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131
> > > >> >
> > > >> > What do others think? Let's try to get the blockers wrapped up
in
> > the
> > > >> next
> > > >> > day or two and start a release vote...
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Jacques Nadeau
> > > >> > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jason Altekruse <
> > > >> altekrusejason@gmail.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hello All,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > With the allocator changes merged and about a month since
the
> last
> > > >> > release
> > > >> > > I think it would be good to start a vote soon. I would like
to
> > > >> volunteer
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > be release manager.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I know that there were some issues that were identified
after
> the
> > > >> > transfer
> > > >> > > patch was merged. I think that these issues should be fixed
> before
> > > we
> > > >> > cut a
> > > >> > > release candidate.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > From looking at the associated JIRAs it looked like there
was a
> > > >> possible
> > > >> > > short term fix just adjusting the max_query_memory_per_node
> > option,
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > some more involved work to change how we determine the correct
> > time
> > > to
> > > >> > > spill during external sort. I believe it makes sense to
make
> > > external
> > > >> > sort
> > > >> > > work well with the newly improved memory accounting before
> > cutting a
> > > >> > > release, but I'm not sure how much work is left to be done
> there.
> > > [1]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Please respond with your thoughts on a release soon and
any
> JIRAs
> > > you
> > > >> > would
> > > >> > > like to include in the release.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > Jason
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message