Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6960186BE for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80285 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2015 17:32:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 80240 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2015 17:32:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@drill.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@drill.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 80229 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2015 17:32:08 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:32:08 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 39FE31A0230 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so98688386wmw.0 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:32:06 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnEDu23rFrGBB01IQPC79WjDPjxB1hcowDnY0tgIIp0iVS546sw8HtduqVU6KP6wP5qcFUS MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.11.207 with SMTP id 198mr45544613wml.47.1447349526680; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:32:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.153.163 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:32:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:32:06 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Drill 1.3.0 (rc2) From: Aman Sinha To: dev@drill.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114449e269064e05245b52a0 --001a114449e269064e05245b52a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Given this issue, I would be a -1 unfortunately. On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Aman Sinha wrote: > Can someone familiar with the parquet changes take a look at DRILL-4070 ? > It seems to break backward compatibility. > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Jacques Nadeau > wrote: > >> Hey Everybody, >> >> I'd like to propose a new release candidate of Apache Drill, version >> 1.3.0. This is the third release candidate (rc2). This addresses some >> issues identified in the the second release candidate including some test >> issues & rpc concurrency issues. >> >> The tarball artifacts are hosted at [2] and the maven artifacts are hosted >> at [3]. This release candidate is based on commit >> 13ab6b1f9897ebcf9179407ffaf84b79b0ee95a1 located at [4]. >> The vote will be open for 72 hours ending at 10PM Pacific, November 13, >> 2015. >> >> [ ] +1 >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 >> >> thanks, >> Jacques >> >> [1] >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313820&version=12332946 >> [2]http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.3.0.rc2/ >> [3] >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedrill-1013/ >> [4] https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/drill-1.3.0 >> >> >> -- >> Jacques Nadeau >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> > > --001a114449e269064e05245b52a0--