drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Naming the new ValueVector Initiative
Date Thu, 12 Nov 2015 21:50:13 GMT
Shall we allow everyone 48 hours to add their own names to the doc
referenced in the original email? A number of you were part of the list
I've already added there. There are more people now so I think we need to
allow additional submissions.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Alex Levenson <alexlevenson@twitter.com>
wrote:

> SGTM -- where do we vote?
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> It sounds like we need to do a little more work on the Vector proposal
>> before the board would like to consider it. The main point of contention
>> right now is the name of the project. We need to decide on a name and get
>> it signed off through PODLINGNAMESEARCH.
>>
>> Naming is extremely subjective so I'd like to propose a process for
>> selection that minimizes pain. This is an initial proposal and
>>
>> We do the naming in the following steps
>> - 1: Collect a set of names to be considered
>> - 2: Run a vote for 2 days where each member ranks their top 10 options
>> 1..10
>> - 3: Take the top ten vote getters and do a basic analysis of whether we
>> think that any have legal issues. Keep dropping names that have this until
>> we get with 10 reasonably solid candidate names
>> - 5: Take the top ten names and give people 48 hours to rank their top 3
>> names
>> - 6: Start a PODLINGNAMESEARCH on the top rank one, if that doesn't work,
>> try the second and third options.
>>
>> I suggest we take name suggestions for step 1 from everyone but then
>> constrain the voting to the newly proposed project [1]. We could just do
>> this in a private email thread but I think doing it on Drill dev is better
>> in the interest of transparency. This isn't the perfect place for that but
>> I'm not sure a better place exists.
>>
>> I'm up for changing any or all of this depending on what others think.
>> Just wanted to get the ball rolling on a proposed process.
>>
>> If this works, I've posted a doc at [2] that we can use for step 1.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jacques
>>
>> [1] List of proposed new project members/voters: Todd Lipcon, Ted
>> Dunning, Michael Stack, P. Taylor Goetz, Julian Hyde, Julien Le Dem,
>> Jacques Nadeau, James Taylor, Jake Luciani, Parth Chandra, Alex Levenson,
>> Marcel Kornacker, Steven Phillips, Hanifi Gunes, Wes McKinney, Jason
>> Altekruse, David Alves, Zain Asgar, Ippokratis Pandis, Abdel Hakim Deneche,
>> Reynold Xin.
>> [2]
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q6UqluW6SLuMKRwW2TBGBzHfYLlXYm37eKJlIxWQGQM/edit#gid=0
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alex Levenson
> @THISWILLWORK
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message