drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Naming the new ValueVector Initiative
Date Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:17:30 GMT
Single vote for most preferred?

Single transferable vote?



On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com> wrote:

> Given that a bunch of people added names to the sheet, I'll take that as
> tacit agreement to the proposed process.
>
> Let's move to the first vote phase. I've added a column for everybody's
> votes. Let's try to wrap up the vote by 10am on Wednesday.
>
> thanks!
> Jacques
>
>
>
> --
> Jacques Nadeau
> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> It sounds like we need to do a little more work on the Vector proposal
>> before the board would like to consider it. The main point of contention
>> right now is the name of the project. We need to decide on a name and get
>> it signed off through PODLINGNAMESEARCH.
>>
>> Naming is extremely subjective so I'd like to propose a process for
>> selection that minimizes pain. This is an initial proposal and
>>
>> We do the naming in the following steps
>> - 1: Collect a set of names to be considered
>> - 2: Run a vote for 2 days where each member ranks their top 10 options
>> 1..10
>> - 3: Take the top ten vote getters and do a basic analysis of whether we
>> think that any have legal issues. Keep dropping names that have this until
>> we get with 10 reasonably solid candidate names
>> - 5: Take the top ten names and give people 48 hours to rank their top 3
>> names
>> - 6: Start a PODLINGNAMESEARCH on the top rank one, if that doesn't work,
>> try the second and third options.
>>
>> I suggest we take name suggestions for step 1 from everyone but then
>> constrain the voting to the newly proposed project [1]. We could just do
>> this in a private email thread but I think doing it on Drill dev is better
>> in the interest of transparency. This isn't the perfect place for that but
>> I'm not sure a better place exists.
>>
>> I'm up for changing any or all of this depending on what others think.
>> Just
>> wanted to get the ball rolling on a proposed process.
>>
>> If this works, I've posted a doc at [2] that we can use for step 1.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jacques
>>
>> [1] List of proposed new project members/voters: Todd Lipcon, Ted Dunning,
>> Michael Stack, P. Taylor Goetz, Julian Hyde, Julien Le Dem, Jacques
>> Nadeau,
>> James Taylor, Jake Luciani, Parth Chandra, Alex Levenson, Marcel
>> Kornacker,
>> Steven Phillips, Hanifi Gunes, Wes McKinney, Jason Altekruse, David Alves,
>> Zain Asgar, Ippokratis Pandis, Abdel Hakim Deneche, Reynold Xin.
>> [2]
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q6UqluW6SLuMKRwW2TBGBzHfYLlXYm37eKJlIxWQGQM/edit#gid=0
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message