drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com>
Subject Re: Temporary branches
Date Thu, 05 Nov 2015 21:50:21 GMT
I think the temporary- concept seems like a simple solution. You want to
propose on that other thread so I can +1?

--
Jacques Nadeau
CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:

>
> > On Nov 5, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure what to do here. INFRA just changed the Git behavior so it
> is
> > no longer possible to delete branches. I generally don't like to have
> > failed branches in a release history (otherwise you get a release branch
> > with all these maven forward/backwards commits). As such, I would
> overwrite
> > candidate branches historically (dropping the failed release commits).
>
> (Moving to a new thread to as not to hijack the VOTE thread.)
>
> I am wresting with the same problem with Calcite. I wonder whether we
> should ask INFRA to treat branches called ‘temporary-…’ differently.
>
> Julian
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message