drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com>
Subject Re: Naming the new ValueVector Initiative
Date Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:10:01 GMT
Everybody should pick their ten favorites using the numbers 1 to 10.

10 is most preferred



--
Jacques Nadeau
CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Single vote for most preferred?
>
> Single transferable vote?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Given that a bunch of people added names to the sheet, I'll take that as
>> tacit agreement to the proposed process.
>>
>> Let's move to the first vote phase. I've added a column for everybody's
>> votes. Let's try to wrap up the vote by 10am on Wednesday.
>>
>> thanks!
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jacques Nadeau
>> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Guys,
>>>
>>> It sounds like we need to do a little more work on the Vector proposal
>>> before the board would like to consider it. The main point of contention
>>> right now is the name of the project. We need to decide on a name and get
>>> it signed off through PODLINGNAMESEARCH.
>>>
>>> Naming is extremely subjective so I'd like to propose a process for
>>> selection that minimizes pain. This is an initial proposal and
>>>
>>> We do the naming in the following steps
>>> - 1: Collect a set of names to be considered
>>> - 2: Run a vote for 2 days where each member ranks their top 10 options
>>> 1..10
>>> - 3: Take the top ten vote getters and do a basic analysis of whether we
>>> think that any have legal issues. Keep dropping names that have this
>>> until
>>> we get with 10 reasonably solid candidate names
>>> - 5: Take the top ten names and give people 48 hours to rank their top 3
>>> names
>>> - 6: Start a PODLINGNAMESEARCH on the top rank one, if that doesn't work,
>>> try the second and third options.
>>>
>>> I suggest we take name suggestions for step 1 from everyone but then
>>> constrain the voting to the newly proposed project [1]. We could just do
>>> this in a private email thread but I think doing it on Drill dev is
>>> better
>>> in the interest of transparency. This isn't the perfect place for that
>>> but
>>> I'm not sure a better place exists.
>>>
>>> I'm up for changing any or all of this depending on what others think.
>>> Just
>>> wanted to get the ball rolling on a proposed process.
>>>
>>> If this works, I've posted a doc at [2] that we can use for step 1.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> [1] List of proposed new project members/voters: Todd Lipcon, Ted
>>> Dunning,
>>> Michael Stack, P. Taylor Goetz, Julian Hyde, Julien Le Dem, Jacques
>>> Nadeau,
>>> James Taylor, Jake Luciani, Parth Chandra, Alex Levenson, Marcel
>>> Kornacker,
>>> Steven Phillips, Hanifi Gunes, Wes McKinney, Jason Altekruse, David
>>> Alves,
>>> Zain Asgar, Ippokratis Pandis, Abdel Hakim Deneche, Reynold Xin.
>>> [2]
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q6UqluW6SLuMKRwW2TBGBzHfYLlXYm37eKJlIxWQGQM/edit#gid=0
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message